Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT665B vs Versatile 295

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT665B

Agricultural

power
290 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
18
Full MT665B specs
Image not recorded
VersatileModel B

Versatile 295

Agricultural

power
290 hp
displacement
543 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 295 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT665B
vs
VersatileVersatile 295

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
MT665B290 hp
295290 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT665B is in the 93rd percentile; 295 is in the 93rd · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 295 higher · +30 ci (+6%)
MT665B513 ci
295543 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT665B is in the 88th percentile; 295 is in the 90th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT665B6
2956
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT665B is in the 74th percentile; 295 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

▲ MT665B higher · +2 (+13%)
MT665B18
29516
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT665B is in the 68th percentile; 295 is in the 50th · 972 models

MT665B (A)295 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT665BVersatile 295Difference
ManufacturerChallengerVersatile—
ModelMT665B295—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT665BVersatile 295Difference
ManufacturerSisuCummins—
Model84ETAQSL9—
Power Output290hp290hpSame
Rated RPM2,200RPM1,500RPM▲ MT665B+700 RPM · +47%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement513ci543ci▲ 295+30 ci · +6%
Bore4.4in4.5in▲ 295+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.7in5.7inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT665BVersatile 295Difference
TypePower ShiftPower shiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT665BVersatile 295Difference
Length206in252in▲ 295+46 in · +22%
Width118inNot recorded—
Height124in135in▲ 295+11 in · +9%
Operating Weight19,550lb23,945lb▲ 295+4,395 lb · +22%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT665BVersatile 295Difference
System TypeOpen CenterClosed-center load sensing—
Steering TypePower SteeringNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT665BVersatile 295Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchThree-Point HitchSame
Hitch CategoryIIIIII/IIIN—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT665BVersatile 295Difference
Chassis Type4x4Not recorded—
Drive Type4WDNot recorded—
Steering TypePower SteeringNot recorded—
Brake TypeManual External Compression BandNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT665BVersatile 295Difference
Starter TypeElectric StarterElectric—

Capacities

SpecChallenger MT665BVersatile 295Difference
Coolant8.9galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT665BVersatile 295Difference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 93rd percentile (290 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 90th percentile (543 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 68th percentile (18)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 82nd percentile (19,550 lb)B · 91st percentile (23,945 lb)
A · MT665BB · 295Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT665BFull spec pageVersatile 295