Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665C
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665C vs Challenger MT665E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT665E
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT665C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT665E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT665C290 hp
MT665E290 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665C is in the 93rd percentile; MT665E is in the 93rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT665C513 ci
MT665E513 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665C is in the 88th percentile; MT665E is in the 88th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT665C6
MT665E6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665C is in the 74th percentile; MT665E is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT665C higher · +1,125 lb (+5%)MT665C25,795 lb
MT665E24,670 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665C is in the 93rd percentile; MT665E is in the 91st · 971 models
MT665C (A)MT665E (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT665E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT665C | MT665E | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT665E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel | AGCO POWER | — |
| Model | 84CTA | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 290hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT665C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 513ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT665E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (Techstar CVT) | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT665E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 223in | 219in | ▲ MT665C+4 in · +2% |
| Height | 133in | 141in | ▲ MT665E+8 in · +6% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 122in | — |
| Operating Weight | 25,795lb | 24,670lb | ▲ MT665C+1,125 lb · +5% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT665E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT665E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 999rpm | — |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,065rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT665E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 26,460lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT665E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Challenger MT665E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 93rd percentile (290 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 88th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (25,795 lb)B · 91st percentile (24,670 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 91st percentile (223 in)B · 89th percentile (219 in)
A · MT665CB · MT665EMedian Agricultural Tractor