Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665C
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665C vs Versatile 295
Image not recorded
VersatileModel B
Versatile 295
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 543 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT665C
vs
VersatileVersatile 295
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT665C290 hp
295290 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665C is in the 93rd percentile; 295 is in the 93rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 295 higher · +30 ci (+6%)MT665C513 ci
295543 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665C is in the 88th percentile; 295 is in the 90th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT665C6
2956
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665C is in the 74th percentile; 295 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT665C higher · +1,850 lb (+8%)MT665C25,795 lb
29523,945 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665C is in the 93rd percentile; 295 is in the 91st · 971 models
MT665C (A)295 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Versatile | — |
| Model | MT665C | 295 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel | Cummins | — |
| Model | 84CTA | QSL9 | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 290hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ MT665C+700 RPM · +47% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 543ci | ▲ 295+30 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 295+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously variable transmission (Techstar CVT) | Power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 223in | 252in | ▲ 295+29 in · +13% |
| Height | 133in | 135in | ▲ 295+2 in · +2% |
| Operating Weight | 25,795lb | 23,945lb | ▲ MT665C+1,850 lb · +8% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing | Closed-center load sensing | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 26,460lb | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT665C | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 93rd percentile (290 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 90th percentile (543 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (25,795 lb)B · 91st percentile (23,945 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 91st percentile (223 in)B · 96th percentile (252 in)
A · MT665CB · 295Median Agricultural Tractor