ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665D
Agricultural
- power
- 299 hp
- displacement
- 514 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665D vs Challenger MT765
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT765
Agricultural
- power
- 299 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT665D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT665D299 hp
MT765299 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665D is in the 93rd percentile; MT765 is in the 93rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT765 higher · +23 ci (+4%)MT665D514 ci
MT765537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665D is in the 88th percentile; MT765 is in the 89th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT665D6
MT7656
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665D is in the 74th percentile; MT765 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT765 higher · +3,980 lb (+16%)MT665D25,365 lb
MT76529,345 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665D is in the 92nd percentile; MT765 is in the 94th · 971 models
MT665D (A)MT765 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT665D | MT765 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel | Caterpillar | — |
| Power Output | 299hp | 299hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 514ci | 537ci | ▲ MT765+23 ci · +4% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.9in | ▲ MT765+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 216in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 141in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 25,365lb | 29,345lb | ▲ MT765+3,980 lb · +16% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 4 Wheel Drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc, hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | Challenger MT765 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (299 hp)B · 93rd percentile (299 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (514 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 92nd percentile (25,365 lb)B · 94th percentile (29,345 lb)
A · MT665DB · MT765Median Agricultural Tractor