ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665D
Agricultural
- power
- 299 hp
- displacement
- 514 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665D vs McCormick Intl ZTX280
Image not recorded
McCormick IntlModel B
McCormick Intl ZTX280
Agricultural
- power
- 280 hp
- displacement
- 506 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 36
ChallengerChallenger MT665D
vs
McCormick IntlMcCormick Intl ZTX280
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT665D higher · +19 hp (+7%)MT665D299 hp
ZTX280280 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665D is in the 93rd percentile; ZTX280 is in the 92nd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT665D higher · +8 ci (+2%)MT665D514 ci
ZTX280506 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665D is in the 88th percentile; ZTX280 is in the 86th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT665D6
ZTX2806
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665D is in the 74th percentile; ZTX280 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT665D higher · +2,213 lb (+10%)MT665D25,365 lb
ZTX28023,152 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665D is in the 92nd percentile; ZTX280 is in the 90th · 971 models
MT665D (A)ZTX280 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | McCormick Intl ZTX280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | McCormick Intl | — |
| Model | MT665D | ZTX280 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | McCormick Intl ZTX280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Sisu Diesel | Cummins | — |
| Power Output | 299hp | 280hp | ▲ MT665D+19 hp · +7% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,200RPM | ▲ ZTX280+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 514ci | 506ci | ▲ MT665D+8 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ ZTX280+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.3in | ▲ MT665D+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | McCormick Intl ZTX280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | McCormick Intl ZTX280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 216in | 210in | ▲ MT665D+6 in · +3% |
| Height | 141in | 122in | ▲ MT665D+19 in · +16% |
| Operating Weight | 25,365lb | 23,152lb | ▲ MT665D+2,213 lb · +10% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | McCormick Intl ZTX280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | McCormick Intl ZTX280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III | III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | McCormick Intl ZTX280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4WD | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | 4 Wheel Drive | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | McCormick Intl ZTX280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT665D | McCormick Intl ZTX280 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (299 hp)B · 92nd percentile (280 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (514 ci)B · 86th percentile (506 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 92nd percentile (25,365 lb)B · 90th percentile (23,152 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 88th percentile (216 in)B · 85th percentile (210 in)
A · MT665DB · ZTX280Median Agricultural Tractor