Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT665E
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT665E vs Versatile 295
Image not recorded
VersatileModel B
Versatile 295
Agricultural
- power
- 290 hp
- displacement
- 543 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT665E
vs
VersatileVersatile 295
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT665E290 hp
295290 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT665E is in the 93rd percentile; 295 is in the 93rd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 295 higher · +30 ci (+6%)MT665E513 ci
295543 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT665E is in the 88th percentile; 295 is in the 90th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT665E6
2956
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT665E is in the 74th percentile; 295 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT665E higher · +725 lb (+3%)MT665E24,670 lb
29523,945 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT665E is in the 91st percentile; 295 is in the 91st · 971 models
MT665E (A)295 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Versatile | — |
| Model | MT665E | 295 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | QSL9 | — |
| Power Output | 290hp | 290hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ MT665E+600 RPM · +40% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 543ci | ▲ 295+30 ci · +6% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 295+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 219in | 252in | ▲ 295+33 in · +15% |
| Height | 141in | 135in | ▲ MT665E+6 in · +4% |
| Wheelbase | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 24,670lb | 23,945lb | ▲ MT665E+725 lb · +3% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Closed-center load sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 999rpm | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 2 | 1,065rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT665E | Versatile 295 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 93rd percentile (290 hp)B · 93rd percentile (290 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 90th percentile (543 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 91st percentile (24,670 lb)B · 91st percentile (23,945 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 89th percentile (219 in)B · 96th percentile (252 in)
A · MT665EB · 295Median Agricultural Tractor