Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT675C
Agricultural
- power
- 281 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT675C vs Ford 876
Image not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT675C
vs
FordFord 876
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT675C higher · +1 hp (<1%)MT675C281 hp
876280 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT675C is in the 92nd percentile; 876 is in the 92nd · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 876 higher · +98 ci (+19%)MT675C513 ci
876611 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT675C is in the 88th percentile; 876 is in the 93rd · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT675C6
8766
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT675C is in the 74th percentile; 876 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT675C higher · +7,695 lb (+43%)MT675C25,795 lb
87618,100 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT675C is in the 93rd percentile; 876 is in the 79th · 971 models
MT675C (A)876 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Ford 876 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Ford | — |
| Model | MT675C | 876 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Ford 876 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO SISU POWER | Cummins | — |
| Model | 84CTA | LT10-A280 | — |
| Power Output | 281hp | 280hp | ▲ MT675C+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,200RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ MT675C+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 611ci | ▲ 876+98 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.9in | ▲ 876+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.4in | ▲ MT675C+0.3 in · +6% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Ford 876 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Techstar CVT, continuously variable transmission | full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Ford 876 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 223in | 260in | ▲ 876+37 in · +17% |
| Height | 133in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 25,795lb | 18,100lb | ▲ MT675C+7,695 lb · +43% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Ford 876 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center load sensing | closed center load sensing | Same |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Ford 876 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 420/90R30 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 480/80R46 | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Ford 876 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Ford 876 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 volts | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Ford 876 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 14.1gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT675C | Ford 876 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 92nd percentile (281 hp)B · 92nd percentile (280 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 93rd percentile (611 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 93rd percentile (25,795 lb)B · 79th percentile (18,100 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 91st percentile (223 in)B · 97th percentile (260 in)
A · MT675CB · 876Median Agricultural Tractor