Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT675E
Agricultural
- power
- 320 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT675E vs Challenger MT755D
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT755D
Agricultural
- power
- 318 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT675E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT755D
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT675E higher · +2 hp (<1%)MT675E320 hp
MT755D318 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT675E is in the 95th percentile; MT755D is in the 95th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT675E513 ci
MT755D513 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT675E is in the 88th percentile; MT755D is in the 88th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT675E6
MT755D6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT675E is in the 74th percentile; MT755D is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT755D higher · +6,850 lb (+28%)MT675E24,670 lb
MT755D31,520 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT675E is in the 91st percentile; MT755D is in the 95th · 971 models
MT675E (A)MT755D (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT675E | MT755D | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural, Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | AGCO POWER | Same |
| Power Output | 320hp | 318hp | ▲ MT675E+2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 513ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT with two mechanical ranges | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 219in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 141in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 24,670lb | 31,520lb | ▲ MT755D+6,850 lb · +28% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Closed-center Pressure-flow Compensated (PFC) | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic Differential | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | III/IIIN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Electro-hydraulic Differential | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic Wet Disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 12 Volts Electric Starter | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier IV | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Challenger MT755D | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 95th percentile (320 hp)B · 95th percentile (318 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 88th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 91st percentile (24,670 lb)B · 95th percentile (31,520 lb)
A · MT675EB · MT755DMedian Agricultural Tractor