Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT675E vs Challenger MT765C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT675E

Agricultural

power
320 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT675E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765C

Crawler

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT675E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT765C higher · +1 hp (<1%)
MT675E320 hp
MT765C321 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT675E is in the 95th percentile; MT765C is in the 95th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT765C higher · +24 ci (+5%)
MT675E513 ci
MT765C537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT675E is in the 88th percentile; MT765C is in the 89th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT675E6
MT765C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT675E is in the 74th percentile; MT765C is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT765C higher · +6,415 lb (+26%)
MT675E24,670 lb
MT765C31,085 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT675E is in the 91st percentile; MT765C is in the 95th · 971 models

MT675E (A)MT765C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT675EChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT675EMT765C—
CategoryAgriculturalCrawler, Agricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT675EChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerAGCO POWERCaterpillar—
ModelNot recordedC9 ACERT—
Power Output320hp321hp▲ MT765C+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement513ci537ci▲ MT765C+24 ci · +5%
Bore4.4in4.4inSame
Stroke5.7in5.9in▲ MT765C+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT675EChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeCVT with two mechanical ranges16-Speed Full Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT675EChallenger MT765CDifference
Length219in233in▲ MT765C+14 in · +6%
WidthNot recorded133in—
Height141in136in▲ MT675E+5 in · +4%
Wheelbase122inNot recorded—
Operating Weight24,670lb31,085lb▲ MT765C+6,415 lb · +26%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT675EChallenger MT765CDifference
System TypeClosed Center Load Sensing (CCLS)Closed center pressure-flow compensated—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT675EChallenger MT765CDifference
Hitch TypeIII/IVNNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIII/IVNCategory III/IIIN—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT675EChallenger MT765CDifference
Chassis TypeNot recordedCrawler—
Steering TypeHydrostatic PowerElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—
Brake TypeNot recordedHydraulic Wet Disc—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT675EChallenger MT765CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT675EChallenger MT765CDifference
StandardTier IVNot recorded—
Control SystemSelective Catalytic Reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT675EChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 95th percentile (320 hp)B · 95th percentile (321 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 91st percentile (24,670 lb)B · 95th percentile (31,085 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 89th percentile (219 in)B · 93rd percentile (233 in)
A · MT675EB · MT765CMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT675EFull spec pageChallenger MT765C