Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT675E
Agricultural
- power
- 320 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT675E vs Massey Ferguson 8732S
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 8732S
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 320 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT675E
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8732S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT675E320 hp
8732S320 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT675E is in the 95th percentile; 8732S is in the 95th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT675E513 ci
8732S513 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT675E is in the 88th percentile; 8732S is in the 87th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT675E6
8732S6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT675E is in the 74th percentile; 8732S is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT675E higher · +860 lb (+4%)MT675E24,670 lb
8732S23,810 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT675E is in the 91st percentile; 8732S is in the 90th · 971 models
MT675E (A)8732S (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT675E | 8732S | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | AGCO Power | Same |
| Power Output | 320hp | 320hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,950RPM | ▲ MT675E+150 RPM · +8% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 513ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT with two mechanical ranges | continuously-variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 219in | 219in | Same |
| Height | 141in | 138in | ▲ MT675E+3 in · +2% |
| Wheelbase | 122in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 24,670lb | 23,810lb | ▲ MT675E+860 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | closed-center load-sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard | Tier IV | Not recorded | — |
| Control System | Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT675E | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 95th percentile (320 hp)B · 95th percentile (320 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 87th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 91st percentile (24,670 lb)B · 90th percentile (23,810 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 89th percentile (219 in)B · 89th percentile (219 in)
A · MT675EB · 8732SMedian Agricultural Tractor