Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT685E
Agricultural
- power
- 305 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT685E vs Denning B Pug
DenningModel B
Denning B Pug
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 316 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT685E
vs
DenningDenning B Pug
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Displacement
▲ MT685E higher · +197 ci (+62%)MT685E513 ci
B Pug316 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT685E is in the 88th percentile; B Pug is in the 49th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT685E higher · +2 (+50%)MT685E6
B Pug4
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT685E is in the 74th percentile; B Pug is in the 31st · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT685E higher · +21,335 lb (+610%)MT685E24,835 lb
B Pug3,500 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT685E is in the 92nd percentile; B Pug is in the 3rd · 971 models
MT685E (A)B Pug (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT685E | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Denning | — |
| Model | MT685E | B Pug | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility, Standard Tread | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT685E | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 305hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ MT685E+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 513ci | 316ci | ▲ MT685E+197 ci · +62% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.3in | ▲ MT685E+0.4 in · +8% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT685E | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | Not recorded | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT685E | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 219in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 141in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 24,835lb | 3,500lb | ▲ MT685E+21,335 lb · +610% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT685E | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT685E | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Rear Type: III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3/4N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT685E | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 | — |
| Drive Type | Front-wheel assist | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Power | Manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT685E | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT685E | Denning B Pug | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 49th percentile (316 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 31st percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 92nd percentile (24,835 lb)B · 3rd percentile (3,500 lb)
A · MT685EB · B PugMedian Agricultural Tractor