Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT738
Crawler
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Crawler
Challenger MT738 vs John Deere 9520T
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9520T
Crawler
- power
- 333 hp
- displacement
- 765 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChallengerChallenger MT738
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9520T
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ 9520T higher · +8 hp (+2%)MT738325 hp
9520T333 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
MT738 is in the 67th percentile; 9520T is in the 68th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9520T higher · +166 ci (+28%)MT738599 ci
9520T765 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
MT738 is in the 66th percentile; 9520T is in the 78th · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ MT738 higher · +1 (+17%)MT7387
9520T6
Median Crawler Tractor6
MT738 is in the 97th percentile; 9520T is in the 50th · 192 models
Operating Weight
▲ 9520T higher · +7,535 lb (+21%)MT73836,050 lb
9520T43,585 lb
Median Crawler Tractor23,320 lb
MT738 is in the 77th percentile; 9520T is in the 84th · 173 models
MT738 (A)9520T (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | John Deere 9520T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT738 | 9520T | — |
| Category | Crawler | Crawler | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | John Deere 9520T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO | John Deere | — |
| Model | Power | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 325hp | 333hp | ▲ 9520T+8 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 1,701RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 9520T+399 RPM · +23% |
| Cylinders | 7 | 6 | ▲ MT738+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 599ci | 765ci | ▲ 9520T+166 ci · +28% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 5in | ▲ 9520T+0.6 in · +14% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 6.5in | ▲ 9520T+0.8 in · +14% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | John Deere 9520T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | CVT, infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motors | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | John Deere 9520T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 237in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 141in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 139in | — |
| Operating Weight | 36,050lb | 43,585lb | ▲ 9520T+7,535 lb · +21% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | John Deere 9520T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Load sensing | Closed center pressure/flow compensated | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 50.8gpm | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | John Deere 9520T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Three-Point Hitch | Same |
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | III, IV/IVN | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 14,921lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | John Deere 9520T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Tracklayer-rubber tracked | Track | — |
| Drive Type | Track | Track | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Electro-hydraulic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | John Deere 9520T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | John Deere 9520T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 16gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT738 | John Deere 9520T | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 67th percentile (325 hp)B · 68th percentile (333 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 66th percentile (599 ci)B · 78th percentile (765 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 97th percentile (7)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 23,320 lbA · 77th percentile (36,050 lb)B · 84th percentile (43,585 lb)
A · MT738B · 9520TMedian Crawler Tractor