Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT743 vs Challenger MT875B

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT743

Crawler

power
425 hp
displacement
599 ci
Cylinders
7
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full MT743 specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT875B

Agricultural

power
431 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT875B specs
ChallengerChallenger MT743
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT875B

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT875B higher · +6 hp (+1%)
MT743425 hp
MT875B431 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT743 is in the 98th percentile; MT875B is in the 98th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT875B higher · +506 ci (+84%)
MT743599 ci
MT875B1,105 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT743 is in the 92nd percentile; MT875B is in the 99th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

▲ MT743 higher · +1 (+17%)
MT7437
MT875B6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT743 is in the 98th percentile; MT875B is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT875B higher · +7,480 lb (+21%)
MT74336,220 lb
MT875B43,700 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT743 is in the 97th percentile; MT875B is in the 98th · 971 models

MT743 (A)MT875B (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT875BDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT743MT875B—
CategoryCrawler, AgriculturalAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT875BDifference
ManufacturerAGCO PowerCaterpillar—
ModelAGCO Power 9.8 LC18—
Power Output425hp431hp▲ MT875B+6 hp · +1%
Rated RPM1,700RPM2,100RPM▲ MT875B+400 RPM · +24%
Cylinders76▲ MT743+1 · +17%
Displacement599ci1,105ci▲ MT875B+506 ci · +84%
Bore4.4in5.7in▲ MT875B+1.3 in · +30%
Stroke5.7in7.2in▲ MT875B+1.5 in · +26%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT875BDifference
TypeCVT. Infinitely variable hydrostatic using variable-displacement pump and motorsCat Powershift (Full Power Shift)—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT875BDifference
LengthNot recorded266in—
Width88in141in▲ MT875B+53 in · +60%
HeightNot recorded138in—
Operating Weight36,220lb43,700lb▲ MT875B+7,480 lb · +21%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT875BDifference
System TypeLoad sensingClosed Center PFC—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT875BDifference
Power Rating377hpNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT875BDifference
Hitch TypeCategory III/IVNNo 3-point hitch available—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—
Hitch Capacity19,000lbNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT875BDifference
Chassis TypeCrawlerNot recorded—
Drive TypeTracksNot recorded—
Steering TypePowerNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT875BDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectric Starter (12V)—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT743Challenger MT875BDifference
TypeCabNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 98th percentile (425 hp)B · 98th percentile (431 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 92nd percentile (599 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 98th percentile (7)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 97th percentile (36,220 lb)B · 98th percentile (43,700 lb)

Width

median 79.5 in
A · 63rd percentile (88 in)B · 98th percentile (141 in)
A · MT743B · MT875BMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT743Full spec pageChallenger MT875B