Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT745
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 255 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 30
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT745 vs Claas Xerion 2500
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 2500
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 250 hp
- displacement
- 530 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT745
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 2500
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT745 higher · +5 hp (+2%)MT745255 hp
Xerion 2500250 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT745 is in the 17th percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 15th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT745 higher · +7 ci (+1%)MT745537 ci
Xerion 2500530 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT745 is in the 13th percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 11th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT7456
Xerion 25006
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT745 is in the 50th percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 50th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT745 higher · +7,247 lb (+35%)MT74528,195 lb
Xerion 250020,948 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
MT745 is in the 26th percentile; Xerion 2500 is in the 13th · 132 models
MT745 (A)Xerion 2500 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Claas | — |
| Model | MT745 | Xerion 2500 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1306 | — |
| Power Output | 255hp | 250hp | ▲ MT745+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 537ci | 530ci | ▲ MT745+7 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.6in | ▲ Xerion 2500+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.3in | ▲ MT745+0.6 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift / Creeper | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 248in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Operating Weight | 28,195lb | 20,948lb | ▲ MT745+7,247 lb · +35% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Claas Xerion 2500 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 17th percentile (255 hp)B · 15th percentile (250 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 13th percentile (537 ci)B · 11th percentile (530 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 26th percentile (28,195 lb)B · 13th percentile (20,948 lb)
A · MT745B · Xerion 2500Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor