Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT745
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 255 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 30
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT745 vs Versatile 260
VersatileModel B
Versatile 260
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 260 hp
- displacement
- 543 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT745
vs
VersatileVersatile 260
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 260 higher · +5 hp (+2%)MT745255 hp
260260 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT745 is in the 17th percentile; 260 is in the 17th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 260 higher · +6 ci (+1%)MT745537 ci
260543 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT745 is in the 13th percentile; 260 is in the 15th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT7456
2606
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT745 is in the 50th percentile; 260 is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT745 higher · +14 (+88%)MT74530
26016
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT745 is in the 99th percentile; 260 is in the 50th · 146 models
MT745 (A)260 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Versatile | — |
| Model | MT745 | 260 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | QSL9 | — |
| Power Output | 255hp | 260hp | ▲ 260+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 537ci | 543ci | ▲ 260+6 ci · +1% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 260+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.7in | ▲ MT745+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift / Creeper | Full Power Shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 252in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 132in | — |
| Operating Weight | 28,195lb | 23,945lb | ▲ MT745+4,250 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Closed Center Load Sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT745 | Versatile 260 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 17th percentile (255 hp)B · 17th percentile (260 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 13th percentile (537 ci)B · 15th percentile (543 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 99th percentile (30)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 26th percentile (28,195 lb)B · 17th percentile (23,945 lb)
A · MT745B · 260Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor