Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT745B
Specialized
- power
- 269 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Specialized
Challenger MT745B vs John Deere 310SJ
John DeereModel B
John Deere 310SJ
Specialized
- power
- 93 hp
- displacement
- 276 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
ChallengerChallenger MT745B
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 310SJ
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Specialized
Engine Power
▲ MT745B higher · +176 hp (+189%)MT745B269 hp
310SJ93 hp
Median Specialized Tractor62 hp
MT745B is in the 99th percentile; 310SJ is in the 94th · 55 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT745B higher · +261 ci (+95%)MT745B537 ci
310SJ276 ci
Median Specialized Tractor239 ci
MT745B is in the 98th percentile; 310SJ is in the 82nd · 56 models
Cylinders
▲ MT745B higher · +2 (+50%)MT745B6
310SJ4
Median Specialized Tractor4
MT745B is in the 99th percentile; 310SJ is in the 50th · 58 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT745B higher · +12 (+300%)MT745B16
310SJ4
Median Specialized Tractor4
MT745B is in the 99th percentile; 310SJ is in the 50th · 43 models
MT745B (A)310SJ (B)Median Specialized Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT745B | John Deere 310SJ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | John Deere | — |
| Model | MT745B | 310SJ | — |
| Category | Specialized | Specialized, Backhoe Loader | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT745B | John Deere 310SJ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | John Deere | — |
| Model | C9 ACERT Tech Tier 3 | 4045T | — |
| Power Output | 269hp | 93hp | ▲ MT745B+176 hp · +189% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ MT745B+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ MT745B+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 537ci | 276ci | ▲ MT745B+261 ci · +95% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.2in | ▲ MT745B+0.2 in · +5% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5in | ▲ MT745B+0.9 in · +18% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT745B | John Deere 310SJ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Full powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT745B | John Deere 310SJ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 233in | 282in | ▲ 310SJ+49 in · +21% |
| Width | 133in | 85.8in | ▲ MT745B+47.2 in · +55% |
| Height | 136in | 110in | ▲ MT745B+26 in · +24% |
| Operating Weight | 31,075lb | 17,040lb | ▲ MT745B+14,035 lb · +82% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT745B | John Deere 310SJ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center PFC | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT745B | John Deere 310SJ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Standard Cat.3/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | IIIN/III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 16,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT745B | John Deere 310SJ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Not recorded | Hydraulic wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT745B | John Deere 310SJ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT745B | John Deere 310SJ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 6.5gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT745B | John Deere 310SJ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 62 hpA · 99th percentile (269 hp)B · 94th percentile (93 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 239 ciA · 98th percentile (537 ci)B · 82nd percentile (276 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 99th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 4A · 99th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 12,600 lbA · 99th percentile (31,075 lb)B · 95th percentile (17,040 lb)
A · MT745BB · 310SJMedian Specialized Tractor