Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT755
Agricultural
- power
- 270 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 30
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT755 vs Fendt 930
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 930
Agricultural
- power
- 264 hp
- displacement
- 551 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT755
vs
FendtFendt 930
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT755 higher · +6 hp (+2%)MT755270 hp
930264 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT755 is in the 91st percentile; 930 is in the 90th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 930 higher · +14 ci (+3%)MT755537 ci
930551 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT755 is in the 89th percentile; 930 is in the 91st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT7556
9306
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT755 is in the 74th percentile; 930 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT755 higher · +1,155 lb (+4%)MT75529,365 lb
93028,210 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT755 is in the 94th percentile; 930 is in the 93rd · 971 models
MT755 (A)930 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT755 | Fendt 930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT755 | 930 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT755 | Fendt 930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | MAN | — |
| Power Output | 270hp | 264hp | ▲ MT755+6 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ MT755+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 537ci | 551ci | ▲ 930+14 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 930+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.7in | ▲ MT755+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT755 | Fendt 930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | CVT (Continuous Variable Transmission) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT755 | Fendt 930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 108in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 131in | — |
| Operating Weight | 29,365lb | 28,210lb | ▲ MT755+1,155 lb · +4% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT755 | Fendt 930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT755 | Fendt 930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT755 | Fendt 930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT755 | Fendt 930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 91st percentile (270 hp)B · 90th percentile (264 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 91st percentile (551 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 94th percentile (29,365 lb)B · 93rd percentile (28,210 lb)
A · MT755B · 930Median Agricultural Tractor