Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT755B
Agricultural
- power
- 316 hp
- displacement
- 537 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT755B vs Fendt 936
FendtModel B
Fendt 936
Agricultural
- power
- 315 hp
- displacement
- 551 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT755B
vs
FendtFendt 936
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT755B higher · +1 hp (<1%)MT755B316 hp
936315 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT755B is in the 95th percentile; 936 is in the 94th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 936 higher · +14 ci (+3%)MT755B537 ci
936551 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT755B is in the 89th percentile; 936 is in the 91st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT755B6
9366
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT755B is in the 74th percentile; 936 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT755B higher · +2,625 lb (+9%)MT755B31,000 lb
93628,375 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT755B is in the 95th percentile; 936 is in the 94th · 971 models
MT755B (A)936 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT755B | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT755B | 936 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT755B | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | MAN Diesel | — |
| Model | C9 ACERT Tech Tier 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 316hp | 315hp | ▲ MT755B+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,701RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ MT755B+1 RPM · <1% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 537ci | 551ci | ▲ 936+14 ci · +3% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.5in | ▲ 936+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.7in | ▲ MT755B+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT755B | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | CVT (stepless Vario with a combination of mechanical and hydrostatic sections) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT755B | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 233in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 133in | 109in | ▲ MT755B+24 in · +22% |
| Height | 136in | 131in | ▲ MT755B+5 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 31,000lb | 28,375lb | ▲ MT755B+2,625 lb · +9% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT755B | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center PFC | Not recorded | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | 44.5gpm | Not recorded | — |
| Pressure | 2,734psi | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic power | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT755B | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Standard Cat.3/3N | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 16,000lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT755B | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic power | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT755B | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | 4.7 KW Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT755B | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 95th percentile (316 hp)B · 94th percentile (315 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 91st percentile (551 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 95th percentile (31,000 lb)B · 94th percentile (28,375 lb)
Width
median 79.5 inA · 97th percentile (133 in)B · 92nd percentile (109 in)
A · MT755BB · 936Median Agricultural Tractor