Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT755C vs Challenger MT765C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT755C

Agricultural

power
301 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT755C specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT765C

Crawler

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT755C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 497–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT765C higher · +20 hp (+7%)
MT755C301 hp
MT765C321 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT755C is in the 94th percentile; MT765C is in the 95th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

= Effectively tied
MT755C537 ci
MT765C537 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT755C is in the 89th percentile; MT765C is in the 89th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT755C6
MT765C6
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT755C is in the 74th percentile; MT765C is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT755C16
MT765C16
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT755C is in the 50th percentile; MT765C is in the 50th · 972 models

MT755C (A)MT765C (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT755CMT765C—
CategoryAgriculturalCrawler, Agricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelC9 ACERTC9 ACERTSame
Power Output301hp321hp▲ MT765C+20 hp · +7%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement537ci537ciSame
Bore4.4in4.4inSame
Stroke5.9in5.9inSame

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeFull power shift16-Speed Full Power Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765CDifference
Length233in233inSame
Width133in133inSame
Height136in136inSame
Operating Weight30,195lb31,085lb▲ MT765C+890 lb · +3%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765CDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed center pressure-flow compensatedSame
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765CDifference
Hitch CategoryIII/IIINCategory III/IIIN—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765CDifference
Chassis TypeCrawlerCrawlerSame
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discHydraulic Wet DiscSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT755CChallenger MT765CDifference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 94th percentile (301 hp)B · 95th percentile (321 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 89th percentile (537 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 94th percentile (30,195 lb)B · 95th percentile (31,085 lb)
A · MT755CB · MT765CMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT755CFull spec pageChallenger MT765C