Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT755C vs Massey Ferguson 8S.305

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT755C

Agricultural

power
301 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT755C specs
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 8S.305

Agricultural

power
302 hp
displacement
449 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 8S.305 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT755C
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8S.305

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

▲ 8S.305 higher · +1 hp (<1%)
MT755C301 hp
8S.305302 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT755C is in the 94th percentile; 8S.305 is in the 94th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT755C higher · +88 ci (+20%)
MT755C537 ci
8S.305449 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT755C is in the 89th percentile; 8S.305 is in the 80th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT755C6
8S.3056
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT755C is in the 74th percentile; 8S.305 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT755C higher · +8,149 lb (+37%)
MT755C30,195 lb
8S.30522,046 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT755C is in the 94th percentile; 8S.305 is in the 88th · 971 models

MT755C (A)8S.305 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT755CMassey Ferguson 8S.305Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT755C8S.305—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT755CMassey Ferguson 8S.305Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarAGCO Power—
ModelC9 ACERTNot recorded—
Power Output301hp302hp▲ 8S.305+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM1,850RPM▲ MT755C+250 RPM · +14%
Cylinders66Same
Displacement537ci449ci▲ MT755C+88 ci · +20%
Bore4.4in4.3in▲ MT755C+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.9in5.3in▲ MT755C+0.6 in · +11%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT755CMassey Ferguson 8S.305Difference
TypeFull power shiftcontinuously-variable transmission—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT755CMassey Ferguson 8S.305Difference
Length233in212in▲ MT755C+21 in · +10%
Width133inNot recorded—
Height136in134in▲ MT755C+2 in · +1%
Operating Weight30,195lb22,046lb▲ MT755C+8,149 lb · +37%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT755CMassey Ferguson 8S.305Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedclosed center load-sensing—
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT755CMassey Ferguson 8S.305Difference
TypeNot recordedRear: 540/1000, Front: 1000—
Speed 1Not recorded540rpm—
Speed 2Not recorded1,000rpm—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT755CMassey Ferguson 8S.305Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedIII—
Hitch CategoryIII/IIINCategory 3—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT755CMassey Ferguson 8S.305Difference
Chassis TypeCrawlerNot recorded—
Steering TypeSpeed sensitive differentialNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT755CMassey Ferguson 8S.305Difference
Starter TypeElectricelectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT755CMassey Ferguson 8S.305Difference
TypeCabcabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 94th percentile (301 hp)B · 94th percentile (302 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 80th percentile (449 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 94th percentile (30,195 lb)B · 88th percentile (22,046 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 93rd percentile (233 in)B · 86th percentile (212 in)
A · MT755CB · 8S.305Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT755CFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 8S.305