ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT755D
Agricultural
- power
- 318 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT755D vs Challenger MT775E
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT775E
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 374 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT755D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT775E
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT775E higher · +56 hp (+18%)MT755D318 hp
MT775E374 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT755D is in the 30th percentile; MT775E is in the 48th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT775E higher · +86 ci (+17%)MT755D513 ci
MT775E599 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT755D is in the 10th percentile; MT775E is in the 19th · 152 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT755D16
MT775E16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT755D is in the 50th percentile; MT775E is in the 50th · 146 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT775E higher · +2,210 lb (+7%)MT755D31,520 lb
MT775E33,730 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
MT755D is in the 34th percentile; MT775E is in the 40th · 132 models
MT755D (A)MT775E (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT755D | MT775E | — |
| Category | Agricultural, Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | AGCO POWER | Same |
| Power Output | 318hp | 374hp | ▲ MT775E+56 hp · +18% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,980RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 513ci | 599ci | ▲ MT775E+86 ci · +17% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Full power shift | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 31,520lb | 33,730lb | ▲ MT775E+2,210 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center Pressure-flow Compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic Differential | Electro-Hydraulic Differential Steering | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 88in | — |
| Rear Tread Adjustment | Not recorded | 88.0" (2235 mm) to 119.5" (3035 mm) | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category IVN/III | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 10,000lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic Differential | Electro-Hydraulic Differential Steering | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Challenger MT775E | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | Not recorded | 12V | — |
| Starter Type | 12 Volts Electric Starter | Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 30th percentile (318 hp)B · 48th percentile (374 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 10th percentile (513 ci)B · 19th percentile (599 ci)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 34th percentile (31,520 lb)B · 40th percentile (33,730 lb)
A · MT755DB · MT775EMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor