ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT755D
Agricultural
- power
- 318 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT755D vs Kubota M5970
Image not recorded
KubotaModel B
Kubota M5970
Utility
- power
- 59.5 hp
- displacement
- 197 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT755D
vs
KubotaKubota M5970
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT755D higher · +259 hp (+434%)MT755D318 hp
M597059.5 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT755D is in the 95th percentile; M5970 is in the 13th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT755D higher · +316 ci (+160%)MT755D513 ci
M5970197 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT755D is in the 88th percentile; M5970 is in the 15th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT755D higher · +3 (+100%)MT755D6
M59703
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT755D is in the 74th percentile; M5970 is in the 8th · 1,130 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT755D16
M597016
Median Agricultural Tractor16
MT755D is in the 50th percentile; M5970 is in the 50th · 972 models
MT755D (A)M5970 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Kubota M5970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Kubota | — |
| Model | MT755D | M5970 | — |
| Category | Agricultural, Four-Wheel Drive | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Kubota M5970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | Kubota | — |
| Model | Not recorded | D3200 | — |
| Power Output | 318hp | 59.5hp | ▲ MT755D+259 hp · +434% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,400RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ MT755D+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 513ci | 197ci | ▲ MT755D+316 ci · +160% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.3in | ▲ MT755D+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 4.5in | ▲ MT755D+1.2 in · +27% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Kubota M5970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Manual with dry disc clutch | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Kubota M5970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 144in | — |
| Width | Not recorded | 72.8in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 95.3in | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,520lb | 5,049lb | ▲ MT755D+26,471 lb · +524% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Kubota M5970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center Pressure-flow Compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic Differential | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Kubota M5970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | II/I and JISII/I | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | Category 2 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Kubota M5970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 MFWD 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic Differential | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Kubota M5970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 Volts Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Kubota M5970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 3.1gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Kubota M5970 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 95th percentile (318 hp)B · 13th percentile (59.5 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 15th percentile (197 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 8th percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 95th percentile (31,520 lb)B · 13th percentile (5,049 lb)
A · MT755DB · M5970Median Agricultural Tractor