ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT755D
Agricultural
- power
- 318 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT755D vs Massey Ferguson 8732
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 8732
Agricultural
- power
- 320 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT755D
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8732
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 8732 higher · +2 hp (<1%)MT755D318 hp
8732320 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT755D is in the 95th percentile; 8732 is in the 95th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT755D513 ci
8732513 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT755D is in the 88th percentile; 8732 is in the 87th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT755D6
87326
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT755D is in the 74th percentile; 8732 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT755D higher · +6,250 lb (+25%)MT755D31,520 lb
873225,270 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT755D is in the 95th percentile; 8732 is in the 92nd · 971 models
MT755D (A)8732 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT755D | 8732 | — |
| Category | Agricultural, Four-Wheel Drive | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | AGCO POWER | Same |
| Model | Not recorded | AGCO Power 8.4L | — |
| Power Output | 318hp | 320hp | ▲ 8732+2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 2,100RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 513ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Continuously variable transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 219in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 141in | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,520lb | 25,270lb | ▲ MT755D+6,250 lb · +25% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center Pressure-flow Compensated (PFC) | Closed center load sensing (CCLS) | — |
| Pump Flow Capacity | Not recorded | 53.1gpm | — |
| Pressure | Not recorded | 2,435psi | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic Differential | Hydrostatic power | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Category III/IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 10,970lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic Differential | Hydrostatic power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 Volts Electric Starter | Electric | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 95th percentile (318 hp)B · 95th percentile (320 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 87th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 95th percentile (31,520 lb)B · 92nd percentile (25,270 lb)
A · MT755DB · 8732Median Agricultural Tractor