ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT755D
Agricultural
- power
- 318 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT755D vs Massey Ferguson 8732S
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B
Massey Ferguson 8732S
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 320 hp
- displacement
- 513 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT755D
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8732S
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 8732S higher · +2 hp (<1%)MT755D318 hp
8732S320 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT755D is in the 30th percentile; 8732S is in the 32nd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT755D513 ci
8732S513 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT755D is in the 10th percentile; 8732S is in the 9th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT755D6
8732S6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT755D is in the 50th percentile; 8732S is in the 50th · 159 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT755D higher · +7,710 lb (+32%)MT755D31,520 lb
8732S23,810 lb
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor37,428 lb
MT755D is in the 34th percentile; 8732S is in the 16th · 132 models
MT755D (A)8732S (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Massey Ferguson | — |
| Model | MT755D | 8732S | — |
| Category | Agricultural, Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | AGCO Power | Same |
| Power Output | 318hp | 320hp | ▲ 8732S+2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | Not recorded | 1,950RPM | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 513ci | 513ci | Same |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | continuously-variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 219in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Operating Weight | 31,520lb | 23,810lb | ▲ MT755D+7,710 lb · +32% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center Pressure-flow Compensated (PFC) | closed-center load-sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic Differential | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IIIN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic Differential | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Wet Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT755D | Massey Ferguson 8732S | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | 12 Volts Electric Starter | electric | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 30th percentile (318 hp)B · 32nd percentile (320 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 10th percentile (513 ci)B · 9th percentile (513 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 34th percentile (31,520 lb)B · 16th percentile (23,810 lb)
A · MT755DB · 8732SMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor