Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT755E
Utility
- power
- 326 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Utility
Challenger MT755E vs Steiger CU-325
Image not recorded
SteigerModel B
Steiger CU-325
Utility
- power
- 325 hp
- displacement
- Not recorded
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
ChallengerChallenger MT755E
vs
SteigerSteiger CU-325
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ MT755E higher · +1 hp (<1%)MT755E326 hp
CU-325325 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
MT755E is in the 97th percentile; CU-325 is in the 97th · 5,383 models
Cylinders
▲ MT755E higher · +1 (+17%)MT755E7
CU-3256
Median Utility Tractor4
MT755E is in the 98th percentile; CU-325 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT755E higher · +6 (+60%)MT755E16
CU-32510
Median Utility Tractor12
MT755E is in the 73rd percentile; CU-325 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
MT755E (A)CU-325 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Steiger CU-325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Steiger | — |
| Model | MT755E | CU-325 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility, Four-Wheel Drive | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Steiger CU-325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | Cummins | — |
| Power Output | 326hp | 325hp | ▲ MT755E+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 1,800RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 7 | 6 | ▲ MT755E+1 · +17% |
| Displacement | 599ci | Not recorded | — |
| Bore | 4.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 5.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Steiger CU-325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | Closed | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Steiger CU-325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | 34in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 33,235lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Steiger CU-325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed-center pressure-flow compensated (PFC) | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Steiger CU-325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category IVN/III | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | Category 3 | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | 17,263lb | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Steiger CU-325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT755E | Steiger CU-325 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 97th percentile (326 hp)B · 97th percentile (325 hp)
Cylinders
median 4A · 98th percentile (7)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 39th percentile (10)
A · MT755EB · CU-325Median Utility Tractor