Head to head · Utility

Challenger MT755E vs Versatile 305

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT755E

Utility

power
326 hp
displacement
599 ci
Cylinders
7
Forward gears
16
Full MT755E specs
Image not recorded
VersatileModel B

Versatile 305

Utility

power
256 hp
displacement
505 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 305 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT755E
vs
VersatileVersatile 305

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Utility

n = 1,083–5,720

Engine Power

▲ MT755E higher · +70 hp (+27%)
MT755E326 hp
305256 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp

MT755E is in the 97th percentile; 305 is in the 96th · 5,383 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT755E higher · +94 ci (+19%)
MT755E599 ci
305505 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci

MT755E is in the 95th percentile; 305 is in the 94th · 5,580 models

Cylinders

▲ MT755E higher · +1 (+17%)
MT755E7
3056
Median Utility Tractor4

MT755E is in the 98th percentile; 305 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT755E16
30516
Median Utility Tractor12

MT755E is in the 73rd percentile; 305 is in the 73rd · 4,941 models

MT755E (A)305 (B)Median Utility Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT755EVersatile 305Difference
ManufacturerChallengerVersatile—
ModelMT755E305—
CategoryUtilityUtilitySame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT755EVersatile 305Difference
ManufacturerAGCO POWERCummins—
ModelNot recordedQSC8.3—
Power Output326hp256hp▲ MT755E+70 hp · +27%
Rated RPM1,800RPM2,100RPM▲ 305+300 RPM · +17%
Cylinders76▲ MT755E+1 · +17%
Displacement599ci505ci▲ MT755E+94 ci · +19%
Bore4.4in4.5in▲ 305+0.1 in · +2%
Stroke5.7in5.3in▲ MT755E+0.4 in · +8%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT755EVersatile 305Difference
TypeSelective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shiftPartially synchronized / Full power shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT755EVersatile 305Difference
LengthNot recorded265in—
Width34inNot recorded—
HeightNot recorded146in—
Operating Weight33,235lb30,890lb▲ MT755E+2,345 lb · +8%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT755EVersatile 305Difference
System TypeClosed-center pressure-flow compensated (PFC)Direct engine drive—
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differentialHydrostatic power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT755EVersatile 305Difference
Hitch TypeCategory IVN/IIIIII—
Hitch CategoryCategory 3Category 3Same
Hitch PositionRearRearSame
Hitch Capacity17,263lb15,791lb▲ MT755E+1,472 lb · +9%

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT755EVersatile 305Difference
Chassis TypeNot recorded4x4 articulated 4WD—
Drive TypeNot recordedFour-wheel Drive (4WD)—
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differentialHydrostatic power—
Brake TypeWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedalNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT755EVersatile 305Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT755EVersatile 305Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 55 hp
A · 97th percentile (326 hp)B · 96th percentile (256 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 183 ci
A · 95th percentile (599 ci)B · 94th percentile (505 ci)

Cylinders

median 4
A · 98th percentile (7)B · 93rd percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 12
A · 73rd percentile (16)B · 73rd percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 5,303 lb
A · 98th percentile (33,235 lb)B · 97th percentile (30,890 lb)
A · MT755EB · 305Median Utility Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT755EFull spec pageVersatile 305