Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT765C vs Massey Ferguson 8732

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT765C

Crawler

power
321 hp
displacement
537 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765C specs
Image not recorded
Massey FergusonModel B

Massey Ferguson 8732

Agricultural

power
320 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
Not recorded
Full 8732 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT765C
vs
Massey FergusonMassey Ferguson 8732

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT765C higher · +1 hp (<1%)
MT765C321 hp
8732320 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT765C is in the 95th percentile; 8732 is in the 95th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT765C higher · +24 ci (+5%)
MT765C537 ci
8732513 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT765C is in the 89th percentile; 8732 is in the 87th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT765C6
87326
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT765C is in the 74th percentile; 8732 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Operating Weight

▲ MT765C higher · +5,815 lb (+23%)
MT765C31,085 lb
873225,270 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb

MT765C is in the 95th percentile; 8732 is in the 92nd · 971 models

MT765C (A)8732 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT765CMassey Ferguson 8732Difference
ManufacturerChallengerMassey Ferguson—
ModelMT765C8732—
CategoryCrawler, AgriculturalAgricultural—

Engine

SpecChallenger MT765CMassey Ferguson 8732Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarAGCO POWER—
ModelC9 ACERTAGCO Power 8.4L—
Power Output321hp320hp▲ MT765C+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement537ci513ci▲ MT765C+24 ci · +5%
Bore4.4in4.4inSame
Stroke5.9in5.7in▲ MT765C+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT765CMassey Ferguson 8732Difference
Type16-Speed Full Power ShiftContinuously variable transmission (CVT)—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT765CMassey Ferguson 8732Difference
Length233in219in▲ MT765C+14 in · +6%
Width133inNot recorded—
Height136in141in▲ 8732+5 in · +4%
Operating Weight31,085lb25,270lb▲ MT765C+5,815 lb · +23%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT765CMassey Ferguson 8732Difference
System TypeClosed center pressure-flow compensatedClosed center load sensing (CCLS)—
Pump Flow CapacityNot recorded53.1gpm—
PressureNot recorded2,435psi—
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelHydrostatic power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT765CMassey Ferguson 8732Difference
Hitch TypeNot recordedCategory III/IVN—
Hitch CategoryCategory III/IIINCategory 3—
Hitch CapacityNot recorded10,970lb—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT765CMassey Ferguson 8732Difference
Chassis TypeCrawlerNot recorded—
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheelHydrostatic power—
Brake TypeHydraulic Wet DiscNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT765CMassey Ferguson 8732Difference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT765CMassey Ferguson 8732Difference
TypeCabCabSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 95th percentile (321 hp)B · 95th percentile (320 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 89th percentile (537 ci)B · 87th percentile (513 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 95th percentile (31,085 lb)B · 92nd percentile (25,270 lb)

Length

median 173 in
A · 93rd percentile (233 in)B · 89th percentile (219 in)
A · MT765CB · 8732Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT765CFull spec pageMassey Ferguson 8732