Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT765D vs Challenger MT835

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT765D

Agricultural

power
339 hp
displacement
513 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT765D specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT835

Agricultural

power
340 hp
displacement
729 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT835 specs
ChallengerChallenger MT765D
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT835

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 971–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT835 higher · +1 hp (<1%)
MT765D339 hp
MT835340 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT765D is in the 96th percentile; MT835 is in the 96th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT835 higher · +216 ci (+42%)
MT765D513 ci
MT835729 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT765D is in the 88th percentile; MT835 is in the 95th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT765D6
MT8356
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT765D is in the 74th percentile; MT835 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT765D16
MT83516
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT765D is in the 50th percentile; MT835 is in the 50th · 972 models

MT765D (A)MT835 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT765DMT835—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
ManufacturerAGCO POWERCaterpillar—
ModelNot recordedC12—
Power Output339hp340hp▲ MT835+1 hp · <1%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement513ci729ci▲ MT835+216 ci · +42%
Bore4.4in5.1in▲ MT835+0.7 in · +16%
Stroke5.7in5.9in▲ MT835+0.2 in · +4%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
TypeFull power shiftFull Power ShiftSame

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
LengthNot recorded266in—
WidthNot recorded142in—
HeightNot recorded139in—
Operating Weight30,880lb40,000lb▲ MT835+9,120 lb · +30%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
System TypeClosed-center pressure-flow compensated (PFC)Closed Center Load Sensing—
Pump Flow Capacity59.6gpmNot recorded—
Pressure2,964psiNot recorded—
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differentialNot recorded—

Power Take-off (PTO)

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
Power Rating339hpNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchType IVN—
Hitch CategoryIII/IIINNot recorded—
Hitch PositionRearRearSame

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
Steering TypeElectro-hydraulic differentialNot recorded—
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discHydraulic Wet DiscSame

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
Battery Voltage12VNot recorded—
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Emissions

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
StandardInterim Tier IVNot recorded—
Control Systemselective catalytic reduction (SCR)Not recorded—

Operator Station

SpecChallenger MT765DChallenger MT835Difference
TypeNot recordedCab—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 96th percentile (339 hp)B · 96th percentile (340 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 88th percentile (513 ci)B · 95th percentile (729 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 95th percentile (30,880 lb)B · 97th percentile (40,000 lb)
A · MT765DB · MT835Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT765DFull spec pageChallenger MT835