ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT765E
Articulated
- power
- 405 hp
- displacement
- 599 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger MT765E vs Fendt 938 Vario MT
FendtModel B
Fendt 938 Vario MT
Agricultural
- power
- 374 hp
- displacement
- 598 ci
- Cylinders
- 7
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT765E
vs
FendtFendt 938 Vario MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT765E higher · +31 hp (+8%)MT765E405 hp
938 Vario MT374 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
MT765E is in the 35th percentile; 938 Vario MT is in the 26th · 62 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT765E higher · +1 ci (<1%)MT765E599 ci
938 Vario MT598 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
MT765E is in the 6th percentile; 938 Vario MT is in the 5th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT765E7
938 Vario MT7
Median Articulated Tractor6
MT765E is in the 92nd percentile; 938 Vario MT is in the 92nd · 61 models
Operating Weight
▲ 938 Vario MT higher · +208 lb (<1%)MT765E33,235 lb
938 Vario MT33,443 lb
Median Articulated Tractor51,335 lb
MT765E is in the 6th percentile; 938 Vario MT is in the 8th · 57 models
MT765E (A)938 Vario MT (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT765E | Fendt 938 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT765E | 938 Vario MT | — |
| Category | Articulated | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT765E | Fendt 938 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO POWER | AGCO Power | Same |
| Power Output | 405hp | 374hp | ▲ MT765E+31 hp · +8% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,450RPM | ▲ MT765E+650 RPM · +45% |
| Cylinders | 7 | 7 | Same |
| Displacement | 599ci | 598ci | ▲ MT765E+1 ci · <1% |
| Bore | 4.4in | 4.4in | Same |
| Stroke | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT765E | Fendt 938 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | continuously-variable transmission | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT765E | Fendt 938 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 241in | — |
| Width | 120in | 98.5in | ▲ MT765E+21.5 in · +22% |
| Height | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Operating Weight | 33,235lb | 33,443lb | ▲ 938 Vario MT+208 lb · <1% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT765E | Fendt 938 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | closed center | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-Hydraulic Differential | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT765E | Fendt 938 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Cat 3 | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | IVN/III | IVN/III | Same |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
| Hitch Capacity | 39,000lb | 41,000lb | ▲ 938 Vario MT+2,000 lb · +5% |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT765E | Fendt 938 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-Hydraulic Differential | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT765E | Fendt 938 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Voltage | 12V | Not recorded | — |
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT765E | Fendt 938 Vario MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 35th percentile (405 hp)B · 26th percentile (374 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 6th percentile (599 ci)B · 5th percentile (598 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 92nd percentile (7)B · 92nd percentile (7)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 6th percentile (33,235 lb)B · 8th percentile (33,443 lb)
Width
median 100 inA · 65th percentile (120 in)B · 49th percentile (98.5 in)
A · MT765EB · 938 Vario MTMedian Articulated Tractor