Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT835C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 402 hp
- displacement
- 928 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT835C vs New Holland 9880
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland 9880
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 400 hp
- displacement
- 855 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT835C
vs
New HollandNew Holland 9880
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT835C higher · +2 hp (<1%)MT835C402 hp
9880400 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT835C is in the 55th percentile; 9880 is in the 53rd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT835C higher · +73 ci (+9%)MT835C928 ci
9880855 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT835C is in the 84th percentile; 9880 is in the 61st · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT835C6
98806
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT835C is in the 50th percentile; 9880 is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT835C higher · +4 (+33%)MT835C16
988012
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT835C is in the 50th percentile; 9880 is in the 27th · 146 models
MT835C (A)9880 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | New Holland 9880 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | MT835C | 9880 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | New Holland 9880 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Cummins | — |
| Model | C15 ACERT | NTA855-A | — |
| Power Output | 402hp | 400hp | ▲ MT835C+2 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 928ci | 855ci | ▲ MT835C+73 ci · +9% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 5.5in | ▲ 9880+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 6.8in | 6in | ▲ MT835C+0.8 in · +13% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | New Holland 9880 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | New Holland 9880 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 270in | 266in | ▲ MT835C+4 in · +2% |
| Width | 142in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 138in | 145in | ▲ 9880+7 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 50,000lb | 25,698lb | ▲ MT835C+24,302 lb · +95% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | New Holland 9880 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | Closed center load-sensing | — |
| Steering Type | Speed sensitive differential | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | New Holland 9880 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Type IVN | — |
| Hitch Category | IVN | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Rear | Same |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | New Holland 9880 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Speed sensitive differential | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | New Holland 9880 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric, 12 volt | Electric | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | New Holland 9880 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 15.9gal | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT835C | New Holland 9880 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Cab | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 55th percentile (402 hp)B · 53rd percentile (400 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 84th percentile (928 ci)B · 61st percentile (855 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 88th percentile (50,000 lb)B · 23rd percentile (25,698 lb)
A · MT835CB · 9880Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor