Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive

Challenger MT855 vs Challenger MT965C

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT855

Four-Wheel Drive

power
450 hp
displacement
893 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT855 specs
Challenger MT965C Tractor
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT965C

Four-Wheel Drive

power
525 hp
displacement
1,105 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full MT965C specs
ChallengerChallenger MT855
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT965C

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive

n = 71–162

Engine Power

▲ MT965C higher · +75 hp (+17%)
MT855450 hp
MT965C525 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp

MT855 is in the 64th percentile; MT965C is in the 80th · 162 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT965C higher · +212 ci (+24%)
MT855893 ci
MT965C1,105 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci

MT855 is in the 69th percentile; MT965C is in the 91st · 152 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT8556
MT965C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6

MT855 is in the 50th percentile; MT965C is in the 50th · 159 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT85516
MT965C16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16

MT855 is in the 50th percentile; MT965C is in the 50th · 146 models

MT855 (A)MT965C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT855Challenger MT965CDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT855MT965C—
CategoryFour-Wheel DriveFour-Wheel DriveSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT855Challenger MT965CDifference
ManufacturerCaterpillarCaterpillarSame
ModelC16C18 ACERT—
Power Output450hp525hp▲ MT965C+75 hp · +17%
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement893ci1,105ci▲ MT965C+212 ci · +24%
Bore5.4in5.7in▲ MT965C+0.3 in · +6%
Stroke6.5in7.2in▲ MT965C+0.7 in · +11%

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT855Challenger MT965CDifference
TypeFull power shiftCaterpillar Powershift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT855Challenger MT965CDifference
Length266in298in▲ MT965C+32 in · +12%
Width142in200in▲ MT965C+58 in · +41%
Height139in151in▲ MT965C+12 in · +9%
Operating Weight41,000lb50,890lb▲ MT965C+9,890 lb · +24%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT855Challenger MT965CDifference
System TypeClosed center load sensingClosed Center Pressure Flow Compensated—

Tires

SpecChallenger MT855Challenger MT965CDifference
Front Tire SizeNot recorded520/85R46—
Rear Tire SizeNot recorded520/85R46—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT855Challenger MT965CDifference
Hitch TypeIVNNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryNot recordedIII/IVN—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT855Challenger MT965CDifference
Brake TypeHydraulic wet discNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT855Challenger MT965CDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 375 hp
A · 64th percentile (450 hp)B · 80th percentile (525 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 826 ci
A · 69th percentile (893 ci)B · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)

Cylinders

median 6
A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 37,428 lb
A · 61st percentile (41,000 lb)B · 90th percentile (50,890 lb)
A · MT855B · MT965CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT855Full spec pageChallenger MT965C