Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT855C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 475 hp
- displacement
- 923 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT855C vs Rome 475C
RomeModel B
Rome 475C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 475 hp
- displacement
- 1,100 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT855C
vs
RomeRome 475C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT855C475 hp
475C475 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT855C is in the 71st percentile; 475C is in the 71st · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 475C higher · +177 ci (+19%)MT855C923 ci
475C1,100 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT855C is in the 83rd percentile; 475C is in the 89th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ 475C higher · +2 (+33%)MT855C6
475C8
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT855C is in the 50th percentile; 475C is in the 92nd · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT855C higher · +4 (+33%)MT855C16
475C12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT855C is in the 50th percentile; 475C is in the 27th · 146 models
MT855C (A)475C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Rome | — |
| Model | MT855C | 475C | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | C15 ACERT | 3408 | — |
| Power Output | 475hp | 475hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 | ▲ 475C+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 923ci | 1,100ci | ▲ 475C+177 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 5.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6.8in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full power shift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 270in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 142in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 138in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 41,000lb | 33,000lb | ▲ MT855C+8,000 lb · +24% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Speed sensitive differential | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III/IVN | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Speed sensitive differential | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic wet discs | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT855C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 71st percentile (475 hp)B · 71st percentile (475 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 83rd percentile (923 ci)B · 89th percentile (1,100 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 92nd percentile (8)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 61st percentile (41,000 lb)B · 38th percentile (33,000 lb)
A · MT855CB · 475CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor