ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT862
Agricultural
- power
- 610 hp
- displacement
- 934 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT862 vs Claas Xerion 5000
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 5000
Utility
- power
- 487 hp
- displacement
- 763 ci
- Cylinders
- Not recorded
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ChallengerChallenger MT862
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 5000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT862 higher · +123 hp (+25%)MT862610 hp
Xerion 5000487 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT862 is in the 99th percentile; Xerion 5000 is in the 98th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT862 higher · +171 ci (+22%)MT862934 ci
Xerion 5000763 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT862 is in the 98th percentile; Xerion 5000 is in the 96th · 1,083 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT862 higher · +12,460 lb (+42%)MT86242,000 lb
Xerion 500029,540 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT862 is in the 98th percentile; Xerion 5000 is in the 94th · 971 models
Length
▲ Xerion 5000 higher · +29 in (+11%)MT862266 in
Xerion 5000295 in
Median Agricultural Tractor173 in
MT862 is in the 99th percentile; Xerion 5000 is in the 99th · 829 models
MT862 (A)Xerion 5000 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Claas | — |
| Model | MT862 | Xerion 5000 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Caterpillar | — |
| Model | D3876 | C13 | — |
| Power Output | 610hp | 487hp | ▲ MT862+123 hp · +25% |
| Rated RPM | 1,730RPM | 2,000RPM | ▲ Xerion 5000+270 RPM · +16% |
| Cylinders | 6 | Not recorded | — |
| Displacement | 934ci | 763ci | ▲ MT862+171 ci · +22% |
| Bore | 5.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-variable transmission | Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 266in | 295in | ▲ Xerion 5000+29 in · +11% |
| Width | 116in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 148in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 42,000lb | 29,540lb | ▲ MT862+12,460 lb · +42% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Four-Wheel Steering | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | Not recorded | 31.5x38 | — |
| Rear Tire Size | Not recorded | 31.5x38 | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 4N | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Four-Wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Four-Wheel Steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Claas Xerion 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 99th percentile (610 hp)B · 98th percentile (487 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 98th percentile (934 ci)B · 96th percentile (763 ci)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 98th percentile (42,000 lb)B · 94th percentile (29,540 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 99th percentile (266 in)B · 99th percentile (295 in)
A · MT862B · Xerion 5000Median Agricultural Tractor