ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT862
Agricultural
- power
- 610 hp
- displacement
- 934 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
Head to head · Agricultural
Challenger MT862 vs Cub Cadet 7000
Image not recorded
Cub CadetModel B
Cub Cadet 7000
Sub-Compact
- power
- 20 hp
- displacement
- 68.6 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
ChallengerChallenger MT862
vs
Cub CadetCub Cadet 7000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ MT862 higher · +590 hp (+2950%)MT862610 hp
700020 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
MT862 is in the 99th percentile; 7000 is in the 1st · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT862 higher · +865 ci (+1262%)MT862934 ci
700068.6 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
MT862 is in the 98th percentile; 7000 is in the 1st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
▲ MT862 higher · +3 (+100%)MT8626
70003
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
MT862 is in the 74th percentile; 7000 is in the 8th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ MT862 higher · +40,163 lb (+2186%)MT86242,000 lb
70001,837 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
MT862 is in the 98th percentile; 7000 is in the 1st · 971 models
MT862 (A)7000 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Cub Cadet | — |
| Model | MT862 | 7000 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Sub-Compact | — |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | MAN | Mitsubishi | — |
| Model | D3876 | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 610hp | 20hp | ▲ MT862+590 hp · +2950% |
| Rated RPM | 1,730RPM | 2,500RPM | ▲ 7000+770 RPM · +45% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 3 | ▲ MT862+3 · +100% |
| Displacement | 934ci | 68.6ci | ▲ MT862+865 ci · +1262% |
| Bore | 5.4in | 3.1in | ▲ MT862+2.3 in · +74% |
| Stroke | 6.7in | 3.1in | ▲ MT862+3.6 in · +116% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Continuously-variable transmission | Partially synchronized | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 266in | 107in | ▲ MT862+159 in · +149% |
| Width | 116in | 46.3in | ▲ MT862+69.7 in · +151% |
| Height | 148in | 78.9in | ▲ MT862+69.1 in · +88% |
| Operating Weight | 42,000lb | 1,837lb | ▲ MT862+40,163 lb · +2186% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power steering | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | Power steering | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT862 | Cub Cadet 7000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 1.5gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 99th percentile (610 hp)B · 1st percentile (20 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 98th percentile (934 ci)B · 1st percentile (68.6 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 8th percentile (3)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 98th percentile (42,000 lb)B · 1st percentile (1,837 lb)
Length
median 173 inA · 99th percentile (266 in)B · 3rd percentile (107 in)
A · MT862B · 7000Median Agricultural Tractor