Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT875C
Articulated
- power
- 586 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Articulated
Challenger MT875C vs Challenger MT975B
ChallengerModel B
Challenger MT975B
Articulated
- power
- 585 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT875C
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT975B
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Articulated
Engine Power
▲ MT875C higher · +1 hp (<1%)MT875C586 hp
MT975B585 hp
Median Articulated Tractor450 hp
MT875C is in the 95th percentile; MT975B is in the 93rd · 62 models
Engine Displacement
= Effectively tiedMT875C1,105 ci
MT975B1,105 ci
Median Articulated Tractor827 ci
MT875C is in the 99th percentile; MT975B is in the 99th · 61 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT875C6
MT975B6
Median Articulated Tractor6
MT875C is in the 50th percentile; MT975B is in the 50th · 61 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT875C16
MT975B16
Median Articulated Tractor16
MT875C is in the 50th percentile; MT975B is in the 50th · 59 models
MT875C (A)MT975B (B)Median Articulated Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT875C | Challenger MT975B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Challenger | Same |
| Model | MT875C | MT975B | — |
| Category | Articulated | Articulated | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT875C | Challenger MT975B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | C18 ACERT | C18 | — |
| Power Output | 586hp | 585hp | ▲ MT875C+1 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 1,105ci | 1,105ci | Same |
| Bore | 5.7in | 5.7in | Same |
| Stroke | 7.2in | 7.2in | Same |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT875C | Challenger MT975B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator-controlled power shift | selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT875C | Challenger MT975B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 270in | 298in | ▲ MT975B+28 in · +10% |
| Width | 142in | 200in | ▲ MT975B+58 in · +41% |
| Height | 138in | 151in | ▲ MT975B+13 in · +9% |
| Operating Weight | 56,000lb | 59,820lb | ▲ MT975B+3,820 lb · +7% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT875C | Challenger MT975B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed center pressure-flow compensated | closed center PFC | — |
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT875C | Challenger MT975B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | IVN/III Opt | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT875C | Challenger MT975B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steering Type | Electro-hydraulic differential steering controlled by steering wheel | Not recorded | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | Same |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT875C | Challenger MT975B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 450 hpA · 95th percentile (586 hp)B · 93rd percentile (585 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 827 ciA · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)B · 99th percentile (1,105 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 51,335 lbA · 75th percentile (56,000 lb)B · 96th percentile (59,820 lb)
A · MT875CB · MT975BMedian Articulated Tractor