Head to head · Agricultural

Challenger MT875E vs Challenger MT965E

Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A

Challenger MT875E

Agricultural

power
561 hp
displacement
1,028 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT875E specs
Image not recorded
ChallengerModel B

Challenger MT965E

Agricultural

power
550 hp
displacement
1,025 ci
Cylinders
12
Forward gears
16
Full MT965E specs
ChallengerChallenger MT875E
vs
ChallengerChallenger MT965E

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 971–1,130

Engine Power

▲ MT875E higher · +11 hp (+2%)
MT875E561 hp
MT965E550 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

MT875E is in the 99th percentile; MT965E is in the 99th · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ MT875E higher · +3 ci (<1%)
MT875E1,028 ci
MT965E1,025 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

MT875E is in the 98th percentile; MT965E is in the 98th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
MT875E12
MT965E12
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

MT875E is in the 99th percentile; MT965E is in the 99th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
MT875E16
MT965E16
Median Agricultural Tractor16

MT875E is in the 50th percentile; MT965E is in the 50th · 972 models

MT875E (A)MT965E (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT965EDifference
ManufacturerChallengerChallengerSame
ModelMT875EMT965E—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT965EDifference
ManufacturerAGCOAGCO Power—
ModelC54854Turbocharged Diesel—
Power Output561hp550hp▲ MT875E+11 hp · +2%
Rated RPM1,500RPM1,900RPM▲ MT965E+400 RPM · +27%
Cylinders1212Same
Displacement1,028ci1,025ci▲ MT875E+3 ci · <1%
Bore4.4inNot recorded—
Stroke5.7inNot recorded—

Transmission

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT965EDifference
TypeFull power shiftPower Shift—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT965EDifference
Width100inNot recorded—
Operating Weight44,265lb47,500lb▲ MT965E+3,235 lb · +7%

Hydraulics

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT965EDifference
System TypeClosed center pressure flow compensatedClosed center pressure-flow compensated—
Pump Flow Capacity58.3gpmNot recorded—
Steering TypePower differentialNot recorded—

Hitch & Towing

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT965EDifference
Hitch TypeDrawbarNot recorded—
Hitch Category4Not recorded—
Hitch PositionNot recordedRear—

Chassis & Drive

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT965EDifference
Chassis TypeTrackedNot recorded—
Drive TypeTransmission selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shiftNot recorded—
Steering TypePower differentialNot recorded—
Brake TypeWet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedalNot recorded—

Electrical

SpecChallenger MT875EChallenger MT965EDifference
Starter TypeElectricElectricSame

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 99th percentile (561 hp)B · 99th percentile (550 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 98th percentile (1,028 ci)B · 98th percentile (1,025 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 99th percentile (12)B · 99th percentile (12)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 99th percentile (44,265 lb)B · 99th percentile (47,500 lb)
A · MT875EB · MT965EMedian Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageChallenger MT875EFull spec pageChallenger MT965E