Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT955C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 475 hp
- displacement
- 928 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT955C vs Rome 475C
RomeModel B
Rome 475C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 475 hp
- displacement
- 1,100 ci
- Cylinders
- 8
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT955C
vs
RomeRome 475C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT955C475 hp
475C475 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT955C is in the 71st percentile; 475C is in the 71st · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 475C higher · +172 ci (+19%)MT955C928 ci
475C1,100 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT955C is in the 84th percentile; 475C is in the 89th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ 475C higher · +2 (+33%)MT955C6
475C8
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT955C is in the 50th percentile; 475C is in the 92nd · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT955C higher · +4 (+33%)MT955C16
475C12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT955C is in the 50th percentile; 475C is in the 27th · 146 models
MT955C (A)475C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT955C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Rome | — |
| Model | MT955C | 475C | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT955C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Caterpillar | Same |
| Model | C15 ACERT | 3408 | — |
| Power Output | 475hp | 475hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 | ▲ 475C+2 · +33% |
| Displacement | 928ci | 1,100ci | ▲ 475C+172 ci · +19% |
| Bore | 5.4in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 6.7in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT955C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled power shift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT955C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 298in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 192in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 151in | Not recorded | — |
| Wheelbase | 156in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 53,890lb | 33,000lb | ▲ MT955C+20,890 lb · +63% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT955C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure-flow Compensated | Not recorded | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Challenger MT955C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT955C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IVN | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT955C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Four wheel drive with triples | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Four wheel drive with triples | 4WD | — |
| Brake Type | Wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT955C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT955C | Rome 475C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 71st percentile (475 hp)B · 71st percentile (475 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 84th percentile (928 ci)B · 89th percentile (1,100 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 92nd percentile (8)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 91st percentile (53,890 lb)B · 38th percentile (33,000 lb)
A · MT955CB · 475CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor