Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT965B
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 510 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT965B vs New Holland T9.560
Image not recorded
New HollandModel B
New Holland T9.560
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 507 hp
- displacement
- 787 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT965B
vs
New HollandNew Holland T9.560
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ MT965B higher · +3 hp (<1%)MT965B510 hp
T9.560507 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT965B is in the 77th percentile; T9.560 is in the 76th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT965B higher · +318 ci (+40%)MT965B1,105 ci
T9.560787 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT965B is in the 91st percentile; T9.560 is in the 39th · 152 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedMT965B6
T9.5606
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT965B is in the 50th percentile; T9.560 is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT965B16
T9.56016
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT965B is in the 50th percentile; T9.560 is in the 50th · 146 models
MT965B (A)T9.560 (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT965B | New Holland T9.560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | New Holland | — |
| Model | MT965B | T9.560 | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT965B | New Holland T9.560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | FPT | — |
| Model | Diesel (Serial No. *EJG01193*) | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 510hp | 507hp | ▲ MT965B+3 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 1,105ci | 787ci | ▲ MT965B+318 ci · +40% |
| Bore | 5.7in | 5.3in | ▲ MT965B+0.4 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 7.2in | 5.9in | ▲ MT965B+1.3 in · +22% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT965B | New Holland T9.560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | selective gear fixed ratio with full range operator controlled powershift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT965B | New Holland T9.560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 298in | 295in | ▲ MT965B+3 in · +1% |
| Width | 200in | 36.5in | ▲ MT965B+164 in · +448% |
| Height | 151in | 144in | ▲ MT965B+7 in · +5% |
| Operating Weight | 50,715lb | 49,500lb | ▲ MT965B+1,215 lb · +2% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT965B | New Holland T9.560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center PFC | Closed center load sensing | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT965B | New Holland T9.560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | IVN/III Opt | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT965B | New Holland T9.560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | Four-wheel Drive (4WD) | — |
| Brake Type | wet multiple disc hydraulically actuated by foot pedal | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT965B | New Holland T9.560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Not recorded | Electric | — |
Emissions
| Spec | Challenger MT965B | New Holland T9.560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control System | Not recorded | SCR (Selective Catalytic Reduction) | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Challenger MT965B | New Holland T9.560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 21.1gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 77th percentile (510 hp)B · 76th percentile (507 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)B · 39th percentile (787 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 90th percentile (50,715 lb)B · 87th percentile (49,500 lb)
A · MT965BB · T9.560Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor