Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT975C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 585 hp
- displacement
- 1,105 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT975C vs Fendt 1165 MT
Image not recorded
FendtModel B
Fendt 1165 MT
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 590 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
ChallengerChallenger MT975C
vs
FendtFendt 1165 MT
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
▲ 1165 MT higher · +5 hp (<1%)MT975C585 hp
1165 MT590 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT975C is in the 88th percentile; 1165 MT is in the 89th · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ MT975C higher · +80 ci (+8%)MT975C1,105 ci
1165 MT1,025 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT975C is in the 91st percentile; 1165 MT is in the 87th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ 1165 MT higher · +6 (+100%)MT975C6
1165 MT12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT975C is in the 50th percentile; 1165 MT is in the 99th · 159 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tiedMT975C16
1165 MT16
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT975C is in the 50th percentile; 1165 MT is in the 50th · 146 models
MT975C (A)1165 MT (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT975C | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Fendt | — |
| Model | MT975C | 1165 MT | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT975C | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | AGCO Power | — |
| Model | C18 ACERT | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 585hp | 590hp | ▲ 1165 MT+5 hp · <1% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 12 | ▲ 1165 MT+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 1,105ci | 1,025ci | ▲ MT975C+80 ci · +8% |
| Bore | 5.7in | 4.4in | ▲ MT975C+1.3 in · +30% |
| Stroke | 7.2in | 5.7in | ▲ MT975C+1.5 in · +26% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT975C | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Caterpillar Powershift, full power shift | Full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT975C | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 298in | 266in | ▲ MT975C+32 in · +12% |
| Width | 200in | 118in | ▲ MT975C+82 in · +69% |
| Height | 151in | 136in | ▲ MT975C+15 in · +11% |
| Operating Weight | 50,535lb | 42,692lb | ▲ MT975C+7,843 lb · +18% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT975C | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Direct engine drive | Closed center pressure flow compensated | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Challenger MT975C | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | IV/III | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT975C | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Challenger MT975C | Fendt 1165 MT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab | Cab | Same |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 88th percentile (585 hp)B · 89th percentile (590 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 91st percentile (1,105 ci)B · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 99th percentile (12)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 89th percentile (50,535 lb)B · 66th percentile (42,692 lb)
A · MT975CB · 1165 MTMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor