Image not recorded
ChallengerModel A
Challenger MT975E
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,025 ci
- Cylinders
- 12
- Forward gears
- 16
Head to head · Four-Wheel Drive
Challenger MT975E vs Woods & Copeland 600C
Image not recorded
Woods & CopelandModel B
Woods & Copeland 600C
Four-Wheel Drive
- power
- 600 hp
- displacement
- 1,150 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 12
ChallengerChallenger MT975E
vs
Woods & CopelandWoods & Copeland 600C
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Four-Wheel Drive
Engine Power
= Effectively tiedMT975E600 hp
600C600 hp
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor375 hp
MT975E is in the 92nd percentile; 600C is in the 92nd · 162 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 600C higher · +125 ci (+12%)MT975E1,025 ci
600C1,150 ci
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor826 ci
MT975E is in the 87th percentile; 600C is in the 96th · 152 models
Cylinders
▲ MT975E higher · +6 (+100%)MT975E12
600C6
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor6
MT975E is in the 99th percentile; 600C is in the 50th · 159 models
Forward Gears
▲ MT975E higher · +4 (+33%)MT975E16
600C12
Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor16
MT975E is in the 50th percentile; 600C is in the 27th · 146 models
MT975E (A)600C (B)Median Four-Wheel Drive Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Challenger | Woods & Copeland | — |
| Model | MT975E | 600C | — |
| Category | Four-Wheel Drive | Four-Wheel Drive | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | AGCO Power | Cummins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | KTA-1150C | — |
| Power Output | 600hp | 600hp | Same |
| Rated RPM | 1,900RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 600C+200 RPM · +11% |
| Cylinders | 12 | 6 | ▲ MT975E+6 · +100% |
| Displacement | 1,025ci | 1,150ci | ▲ 600C+125 ci · +12% |
Transmission
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Power Shift | Powershift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating Weight | 47,500lb | 42,600lb | ▲ MT975E+4,900 lb · +12% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center Pressure-Flow Compensated | Not recorded | — |
Tires
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tire Size | 42x27.95 | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tire Size | 42x27.95 | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x4 articulated 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Challenger MT975E | Woods & Copeland 600C | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 375 hpA · 92nd percentile (600 hp)B · 92nd percentile (600 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 826 ciA · 87th percentile (1,025 ci)B · 96th percentile (1,150 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 99th percentile (12)B · 50th percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 16A · 50th percentile (16)B · 27th percentile (12)
Operating Weight
median 37,428 lbA · 84th percentile (47,500 lb)B · 64th percentile (42,600 lb)
A · MT975EB · 600CMedian Four-Wheel Drive Tractor