ChamberlainModel A
Chamberlain Canelander
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 270 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Chamberlain Canelander vs Ebro Super 55
EbroModel B
Ebro Super 55
Agricultural
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 220 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
ChamberlainChamberlain Canelander
vs
EbroEbro Super 55
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ Canelander higher · +50 ci (+23%)Canelander270 ci
Super 55220 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Canelander is in the 78th percentile; Super 55 is in the 60th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedCanelander4
Super 554
Median Utility Tractor4
Canelander is in the 50th percentile; Super 55 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Canelander higher · +3 (+50%)Canelander9
Super 556
Median Utility Tractor12
Canelander is in the 35th percentile; Super 55 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
Canelander (A)Super 55 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ebro Super 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Chamberlain | Ebro | — |
| Model | Canelander | Super 55 | — |
| Category | Utility, High-Clearance | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ebro Super 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Not recorded | — |
| Model | 4-270D | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 62hp | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | Not recorded | — |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 | Same |
| Displacement | 270ci | 220ci | ▲ Canelander+50 ci · +23% |
| Bore | 4.3in | Not recorded | — |
| Stroke | 4.8in | Not recorded | — |
Transmission
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ebro Super 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Manual | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ebro Super 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 149in | Not recorded | — |
| Width | 79in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 75.5in | Not recorded | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,350lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ebro Super 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ebro Super 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ebro Super 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ebro Super 55 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 78th percentile (270 ci)B · 60th percentile (220 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 11th percentile (6)
A · CanelanderB · Super 55Median Utility Tractor