ChamberlainModel A
Chamberlain Canelander
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 270 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Chamberlain Canelander vs Ford 3930
ChamberlainChamberlain Canelander
vs
FordFord 3930
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ Canelander higher · +16.7 hp (+37%)Canelander62 hp
393045.3 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Canelander is in the 56th percentile; 3930 is in the 40th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Canelander higher · +69 ci (+34%)Canelander270 ci
3930201 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Canelander is in the 78th percentile; 3930 is in the 54th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ Canelander higher · +1 (+33%)Canelander4
39303
Median Utility Tractor4
Canelander is in the 50th percentile; 3930 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ Canelander higher · +1 (+13%)Canelander9
39308
Median Utility Tractor12
Canelander is in the 35th percentile; 3930 is in the 23rd · 4,941 models
Canelander (A)3930 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ford 3930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Chamberlain | Ford | — |
| Model | Canelander | 3930 | — |
| Category | Utility, High-Clearance | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ford 3930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | Ford | — |
| Model | 4-270D | Not recorded | — |
| Power Output | 62hp | 45.3hp | ▲ Canelander+16.7 hp · +37% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 3930+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ Canelander+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 270ci | 201ci | ▲ Canelander+69 ci · +34% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 3930+0.1 in · +2% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 4.4in | ▲ Canelander+0.4 in · +9% |
Transmission
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ford 3930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Gear | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ford 3930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 149in | 137in | ▲ Canelander+12 in · +9% |
| Width | 79in | Not recorded | — |
| Height | 75.5in | 90.9in | ▲ 3930+15.4 in · +20% |
| Operating Weight | 7,350lb | 5,157lb | ▲ Canelander+2,193 lb · +43% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ford 3930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | Open Center | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ford 3930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | Not recorded | 540rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ford 3930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Capacity | Not recorded | 3,076lb | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ford 3930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Power | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ford 3930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Operator Station
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | Ford 3930 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Two-post ROPS | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 56th percentile (62 hp)B · 40th percentile (45.3 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 78th percentile (270 ci)B · 54th percentile (201 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 23rd percentile (8)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 70th percentile (7,350 lb)B · 49th percentile (5,157 lb)
A · CanelanderB · 3930Median Utility Tractor