ChamberlainModel A
Chamberlain Canelander
Utility
- power
- 62 hp
- displacement
- 270 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 9
Head to head · Utility
Chamberlain Canelander vs John Deere 9RX 490
Image not recorded
John DeereModel B
John Deere 9RX 490
Articulated
- power
- 483 hp
- displacement
- 827 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 18
ChamberlainChamberlain Canelander
vs
John DeereJohn Deere 9RX 490
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Power
▲ 9RX 490 higher · +421 hp (+679%)Canelander62 hp
9RX 490483 hp
Median Utility Tractor55 hp
Canelander is in the 56th percentile; 9RX 490 is in the 99th · 5,383 models
Engine Displacement
▲ 9RX 490 higher · +557 ci (+206%)Canelander270 ci
9RX 490827 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
Canelander is in the 78th percentile; 9RX 490 is in the 97th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 9RX 490 higher · +2 (+50%)Canelander4
9RX 4906
Median Utility Tractor4
Canelander is in the 50th percentile; 9RX 490 is in the 93rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 9RX 490 higher · +9 (+100%)Canelander9
9RX 49018
Median Utility Tractor12
Canelander is in the 35th percentile; 9RX 490 is in the 83rd · 4,941 models
Canelander (A)9RX 490 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | John Deere 9RX 490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Chamberlain | John Deere | — |
| Model | Canelander | 9RX 490 | — |
| Category | Utility, High-Clearance | Articulated | — |
Engine
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | John Deere 9RX 490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Perkins | John Deere | — |
| Model | 4-270D | JD14 | — |
| Power Output | 62hp | 483hp | ▲ 9RX 490+421 hp · +679% |
| Rated RPM | 2,000RPM | 2,100RPM | ▲ 9RX 490+100 RPM · +5% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 6 | ▲ 9RX 490+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 270ci | 827ci | ▲ 9RX 490+557 ci · +206% |
| Bore | 4.3in | 5.2in | ▲ 9RX 490+0.9 in · +21% |
| Stroke | 4.8in | 6.5in | ▲ 9RX 490+1.7 in · +35% |
Transmission
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | John Deere 9RX 490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | full power shift | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | John Deere 9RX 490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 149in | 346in | ▲ 9RX 490+197 in · +132% |
| Width | 79in | 88in | ▲ 9RX 490+9 in · +11% |
| Height | 75.5in | 146in | ▲ 9RX 490+70.5 in · +93% |
| Wheelbase | Not recorded | 164in | — |
| Operating Weight | 7,350lb | 56,320lb | ▲ 9RX 490+48,970 lb · +666% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | John Deere 9RX 490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open center | closed center pressure/flow compensated | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | John Deere 9RX 490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Category II | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II | Category 3 | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | John Deere 9RX 490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | 2WD | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | John Deere 9RX 490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Chamberlain Canelander | John Deere 9RX 490 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 14.9gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 55 hpA · 56th percentile (62 hp)B · 99th percentile (483 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 78th percentile (270 ci)B · 97th percentile (827 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 93rd percentile (6)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 35th percentile (9)B · 83rd percentile (18)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 70th percentile (7,350 lb)B · 99th percentile (56,320 lb)
A · CanelanderB · 9RX 490Median Utility Tractor