Head to head · Agricultural

Claas Challenger 35 vs IMT 5210

Image not recorded
ClaasModel A

Claas Challenger 35

Agricultural

power
210 hp
displacement
403 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full Challenger 35 specs
Image not recorded
IMTModel B

IMT 5210

Agricultural

power
210 hp
displacement
690 ci
Cylinders
6
Forward gears
16
Full 5210 specs
ClaasClaas Challenger 35
vs
IMTIMT 5210

How they compare

Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural

n = 795–1,130

Engine Power

= Effectively tied
Challenger 35210 hp
5210210 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp

Challenger 35 is in the 83rd percentile; 5210 is in the 83rd · 1,028 models

Engine Displacement

▲ 5210 higher · +287 ci (+71%)
Challenger 35403 ci
5210690 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci

Challenger 35 is in the 68th percentile; 5210 is in the 95th · 1,083 models

Cylinders

= Effectively tied
Challenger 356
52106
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5

Challenger 35 is in the 74th percentile; 5210 is in the 74th · 1,130 models

Forward Gears

= Effectively tied
Challenger 3516
521016
Median Agricultural Tractor16

Challenger 35 is in the 50th percentile; 5210 is in the 50th · 972 models

Challenger 35 (A)5210 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor

Full comparison

Every spec, side by side

General Information

SpecClaas Challenger 35IMT 5210Difference
ManufacturerClaasIMT—
ModelChallenger 355210—
CategoryAgriculturalAgriculturalSame

Engine

SpecClaas Challenger 35IMT 5210Difference
ManufacturerCaterpillarMercedes-Benz—
Model3116OM 441—
Power Output210hp210hpSame
Rated RPM2,100RPM2,100RPMSame
Cylinders66Same
Displacement403ci690ci▲ 5210+287 ci · +71%
Bore4.1in5.1in▲ 5210+1 in · +24%
Stroke5in5.6in▲ 5210+0.6 in · +12%

Transmission

SpecClaas Challenger 35IMT 5210Difference
TypeFull Power ShiftSynchro—

Dimensions & Weight

SpecClaas Challenger 35IMT 5210Difference
Length211in202in▲ Challenger 35+9 in · +4%
Width91inNot recorded—
Height120in118in▲ Challenger 35+2 in · +2%
Operating Weight22,262lb18,015lb▲ Challenger 35+4,247 lb · +24%

Hydraulics

SpecClaas Challenger 35IMT 5210Difference
System TypeVariable-displacement load-sensing pressure-compensatedNot recorded—
Steering TypeDifferential PowerHydrostatic power—

Hitch & Towing

SpecClaas Challenger 35IMT 5210Difference
Hitch TypeThree-Point HitchNot recorded—
Hitch CategoryIII/IIIII—
Hitch PositionRearNot recorded—

Chassis & Drive

SpecClaas Challenger 35IMT 5210Difference
Chassis TypeCrawler4x4 MFWD 4WD—
Drive TypeTrack4WD—
Steering TypeDifferential PowerHydrostatic power—

Electrical

SpecClaas Challenger 35IMT 5210Difference
Starter TypeElectricNot recorded—

Capacities

SpecClaas Challenger 35IMT 5210Difference
Coolant8.6galNot recorded—

Operator Station

SpecClaas Challenger 35IMT 5210Difference
TypeCabinNot recorded—

Category context

Both models against the field

Engine Power

median 110 hp
A · 83rd percentile (210 hp)B · 83rd percentile (210 hp)

Engine Displacement

median 336 ci
A · 68th percentile (403 ci)B · 95th percentile (690 ci)

Cylinders

median 5.5
A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)

Forward Gears

median 16
A · 50th percentile (16)B · 50th percentile (16)

Operating Weight

median 10,914 lb
A · 89th percentile (22,262 lb)B · 78th percentile (18,015 lb)
A · Challenger 35B · 5210Median Agricultural Tractor
Full spec pageClaas Challenger 35Full spec pageIMT 5210