ClaasModel A
Claas Challenger 65E
Agricultural
- power
- 310 hp
- displacement
- 629 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Claas Challenger 65E vs Fendt 936
FendtModel B
Fendt 936
Agricultural
- power
- 315 hp
- displacement
- 551 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ClaasClaas Challenger 65E
vs
FendtFendt 936
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ 936 higher · +5 hp (+2%)Challenger 65E310 hp
936315 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
Challenger 65E is in the 94th percentile; 936 is in the 94th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger 65E higher · +78 ci (+14%)Challenger 65E629 ci
936551 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
Challenger 65E is in the 93rd percentile; 936 is in the 91st · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedChallenger 65E6
9366
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
Challenger 65E is in the 74th percentile; 936 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ Challenger 65E higher · +5,820 lb (+21%)Challenger 65E34,195 lb
93628,375 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
Challenger 65E is in the 96th percentile; 936 is in the 94th · 971 models
Challenger 65E (A)936 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Claas | Fendt | — |
| Model | Challenger 65E | 936 | — |
| Category | Agricultural | Agricultural | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | MAN Diesel | — |
| Power Output | 310hp | 315hp | ▲ 936+5 hp · +2% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 1,700RPM | ▲ Challenger 65E+400 RPM · +24% |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 629ci | 551ci | ▲ Challenger 65E+78 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 4.9in | 4.5in | ▲ Challenger 65E+0.4 in · +9% |
| Stroke | 5.5in | 5.7in | ▲ 936+0.2 in · +4% |
Transmission
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | CVT (stepless Vario with a combination of mechanical and hydrostatic sections) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 109in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 131in | — |
| Operating Weight | 34,195lb | 28,375lb | ▲ Challenger 65E+5,820 lb · +21% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | III, IV | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | Not recorded | — |
| Drive Type | Crawler Drive | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | 4.7 KW Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Claas Challenger 65E | Fendt 936 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 15gal | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 94th percentile (310 hp)B · 94th percentile (315 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 93rd percentile (629 ci)B · 91st percentile (551 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 96th percentile (34,195 lb)B · 94th percentile (28,375 lb)
A · Challenger 65EB · 936Median Agricultural Tractor