ClaasModel A
Claas Challenger 95E
Crawler
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Agricultural
Claas Challenger 95E vs Claas Xerion 3000
ClaasModel B
Claas Xerion 3000
Agricultural
- power
- 300 hp
- displacement
- 530 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- Not recorded
ClaasClaas Challenger 95E
vs
ClaasClaas Xerion 3000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Agricultural
Engine Power
▲ Challenger 95E higher · +110 hp (+37%)Challenger 95E410 hp
Xerion 3000300 hp
Median Agricultural Tractor110 hp
Challenger 95E is in the 97th percentile; Xerion 3000 is in the 94th · 1,028 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger 95E higher · +199 ci (+38%)Challenger 95E729 ci
Xerion 3000530 ci
Median Agricultural Tractor336 ci
Challenger 95E is in the 95th percentile; Xerion 3000 is in the 89th · 1,083 models
Cylinders
= Effectively tiedChallenger 95E6
Xerion 30006
Median Agricultural Tractor5.5
Challenger 95E is in the 74th percentile; Xerion 3000 is in the 74th · 1,130 models
Operating Weight
▲ Challenger 95E higher · +14,572 lb (+70%)Challenger 95E35,520 lb
Xerion 300020,948 lb
Median Agricultural Tractor10,914 lb
Challenger 95E is in the 97th percentile; Xerion 3000 is in the 87th · 971 models
Challenger 95E (A)Xerion 3000 (B)Median Agricultural Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Claas | Claas | Same |
| Model | Challenger 95E | Xerion 3000 | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Agricultural | — |
Engine
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Perkins | — |
| Model | Not recorded | 1306 / 1306-EDi | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 300hp | ▲ Challenger 95E+110 hp · +37% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 | Same |
| Displacement | 729ci | 530ci | ▲ Challenger 95E+199 ci · +38% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 4.6in | ▲ Challenger 95E+0.5 in · +11% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 5.3in | ▲ Challenger 95E+0.6 in · +11% |
Transmission
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Hydrostatic | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 248in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 138in | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,520lb | 20,948lb | ▲ Challenger 95E+14,572 lb · +70% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Hydrostatic Power | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear | Not recorded | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | 4x4 4WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 4WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Hydrostatic Power | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Caliper Disc | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Not recorded | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | Not recorded | — |
Operator Station
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Claas Xerion 3000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab (Standard) | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 110 hpA · 97th percentile (410 hp)B · 94th percentile (300 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 336 ciA · 95th percentile (729 ci)B · 89th percentile (530 ci)
Cylinders
median 5.5A · 74th percentile (6)B · 74th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 10,914 lbA · 97th percentile (35,520 lb)B · 87th percentile (20,948 lb)
A · Challenger 95EB · Xerion 3000Median Agricultural Tractor