ClaasModel A
Claas Challenger 95E
Crawler
- power
- 410 hp
- displacement
- 729 ci
- Cylinders
- 6
- Forward gears
- 10
Head to head · Crawler
Claas Challenger 95E vs Ford 5000
ClaasClaas Challenger 95E
vs
FordFord 5000
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Crawler
Engine Power
▲ Challenger 95E higher · +341 hp (+493%)Challenger 95E410 hp
500069.1 hp
Median Crawler Tractor200 hp
Challenger 95E is in the 77th percentile; 5000 is in the 39th · 142 models
Engine Displacement
▲ Challenger 95E higher · +496 ci (+213%)Challenger 95E729 ci
5000233 ci
Median Crawler Tractor468 ci
Challenger 95E is in the 75th percentile; 5000 is in the 32nd · 191 models
Cylinders
▲ Challenger 95E higher · +2 (+50%)Challenger 95E6
50004
Median Crawler Tractor6
Challenger 95E is in the 50th percentile; 5000 is in the 33rd · 192 models
Forward Gears
▲ Challenger 95E higher · +2 (+25%)Challenger 95E10
50008
Median Crawler Tractor10
Challenger 95E is in the 50th percentile; 5000 is in the 41st · 179 models
Challenger 95E (A)5000 (B)Median Crawler Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Claas | Ford | — |
| Model | Challenger 95E | 5000 | — |
| Category | Crawler, Agricultural | Utility | — |
Engine
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Caterpillar | Ford | — |
| Power Output | 410hp | 69.1hp | ▲ Challenger 95E+341 hp · +493% |
| Rated RPM | 2,100RPM | 2,100RPM | Same |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 | ▲ Challenger 95E+2 · +50% |
| Displacement | 729ci | 233ci | ▲ Challenger 95E+496 ci · +213% |
| Bore | 5.1in | 4.2in | ▲ Challenger 95E+0.9 in · +21% |
| Stroke | 5.9in | 4.2in | ▲ Challenger 95E+1.7 in · +40% |
Transmission
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Full Power Shift | Sliding gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width | Not recorded | 68.1in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 63.4in | — |
| Operating Weight | 35,520lb | Not recorded | — |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Closed Center | Open center | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Power assist | — |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Rear | Independent | — |
| Speed 1 | 1,000rpm | 540rpm | ▲ Challenger 95E+460 rpm · +85% |
| Speed 2 | Not recorded | 1,000rpm | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | Not recorded | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Crawler | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
| Steering Type | Hydrostatic Differential Steering | Power assist | — |
| Brake Type | Hydraulic Caliper Disc | Differential mechanical wet disc | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 20gal | 3.8gal | ▲ Challenger 95E+16.2 gal · +426% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Claas Challenger 95E | Ford 5000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Cab (Standard) | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Power
median 200 hpA · 77th percentile (410 hp)B · 39th percentile (69.1 hp)
Engine Displacement
median 468 ciA · 75th percentile (729 ci)B · 32nd percentile (233 ci)
Cylinders
median 6A · 50th percentile (6)B · 33rd percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 10A · 50th percentile (10)B · 41st percentile (8)
A · Challenger 95EB · 5000Median Crawler Tractor