CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1250-A
Sub-Compact
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 143 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Sub-Compact
Cockshutt 1250-A vs Massey-Harris 82
Image not recorded
Massey-HarrisModel B
Massey-Harris 82
Lawn and Garden
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 140 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 4
CockshuttCockshutt 1250-A
vs
Massey-HarrisMassey-Harris 82
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Sub-Compact
Engine Displacement
▲ 1250-A higher · +3 ci (+2%)1250-A143 ci
82140 ci
Median Sub-Compact Tractor91.4 ci
1250-A is in the 81st percentile; 82 is in the 79th · 757 models
Cylinders
▲ 82 higher · +1 (+33%)1250-A3
824
Median Sub-Compact Tractor3
1250-A is in the 50th percentile; 82 is in the 90th · 802 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1250-A higher · +2 (+50%)1250-A6
824
Median Sub-Compact Tractor9
1250-A is in the 18th percentile; 82 is in the 2nd · 616 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1250-A higher · +225 lb (+8%)1250-A3,120 lb
822,895 lb
Median Sub-Compact Tractor2,700 lb
1250-A is in the 59th percentile; 82 is in the 54th · 711 models
1250-A (A)82 (B)Median Sub-Compact Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Massey-Harris 82 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Massey-Harris | — |
| Model | 1250-A | 82 | — |
| Category | Sub-Compact | Lawn and Garden | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Massey-Harris 82 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Continental | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 1,500RPM | ▲ 1250-A+900 RPM · +60% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 82+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 143ci | 140ci | ▲ 1250-A+3 ci · +2% |
| Bore | 3.7in | 3.2in | ▲ 1250-A+0.5 in · +16% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 4.4in | ▲ 82+0.1 in · +2% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Massey-Harris 82 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Gear | Unsynchronized Gear | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Massey-Harris 82 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | Not recorded | 119in | — |
| Height | Not recorded | 58in | — |
| Operating Weight | 3,120lb | 2,895lb | ▲ 1250-A+225 lb · +8% |
Power Take-off (PTO)
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Massey-Harris 82 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | 540 (1.375) | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Massey-Harris 82 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Category | II/I | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Massey-Harris 82 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | Not recorded | 4x2 2WD | — |
| Drive Type | Not recorded | 2WD | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Massey-Harris 82 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Starter | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250-A | Massey-Harris 82 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | Not recorded | 2.8gal | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 91.4 ciA · 81st percentile (143 ci)B · 79th percentile (140 ci)
Cylinders
median 3A · 50th percentile (3)B · 90th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 9A · 18th percentile (6)B · 2nd percentile (4)
Operating Weight
median 2,700 lbA · 59th percentile (3,120 lb)B · 54th percentile (2,895 lb)
A · 1250-AB · 82Median Sub-Compact Tractor