Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1250
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 139 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Cockshutt 1250 vs Cockshutt 1265
Image not recorded
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 1265
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 158 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
CockshuttCockshutt 1250
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 1265
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 1265 higher · +19 ci (+14%)1250139 ci
1265158 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1250 is in the 35th percentile; 1265 is in the 42nd · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1250 higher · +1 (+33%)12504
12653
Median Utility Tractor4
1250 is in the 50th percentile; 1265 is in the 23rd · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
= Effectively tied12506
12656
Median Utility Tractor12
1250 is in the 11th percentile; 1265 is in the 11th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1265 higher · +430 lb (+13%)12503,280 lb
12653,710 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1250 is in the 26th percentile; 1265 is in the 32nd · 5,107 models
1250 (A)1265 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Cockshutt | Same |
| Model | 1250 | 1265 | — |
| Category | Utility | Utility | Same |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Fiat | Same |
| Model | 2.3L 4-cyl diesel | Not recorded | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,500RPM | 2,400RPM | ▲ 1250+100 RPM · +4% |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 | ▲ 1250+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 139ci | 158ci | ▲ 1265+19 ci · +14% |
| Bore | 3.3in | 3.9in | ▲ 1265+0.6 in · +18% |
| Stroke | 4in | 4.3in | ▲ 1265+0.3 in · +7% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially Synchronized | Partially Synchronized | Same |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 119in | 115in | ▲ 1250+4 in · +3% |
| Width | 59.9in | 62.5in | ▲ 1265+2.6 in · +4% |
| Height | 58.8in | 56.6in | ▲ 1250+2.2 in · +4% |
| Operating Weight | 3,280lb | 3,710lb | ▲ 1265+430 lb · +13% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Not recorded | Open Center | — |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | Not recorded | 6in | — |
| Rear Tread | Not recorded | 13.6in | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Not recorded | Three-Point Hitch | — |
| Hitch Category | I | II/I | — |
| Hitch Position | Not recorded | Rear | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Manual | Not recorded | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric | Same |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 2.8gal | 3.4gal | ▲ 1265+0.6 gal · +21% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cockshutt 1250 | Cockshutt 1265 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Not recorded | Open | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 35th percentile (139 ci)B · 42nd percentile (158 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 50th percentile (4)B · 23rd percentile (3)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 11th percentile (6)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 26th percentile (3,280 lb)B · 32nd percentile (3,710 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 26th percentile (119 in)B · 20th percentile (115 in)
A · 1250B · 1265Median Utility Tractor