Image not recorded
CockshuttModel A
Cockshutt 1265
Utility
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 158 ci
- Cylinders
- 3
- Forward gears
- 6
Head to head · Utility
Cockshutt 1265 vs Cockshutt 1350
Image not recorded
CockshuttModel B
Cockshutt 1350
Row Crop
- power
- Not recorded
- displacement
- 206 ci
- Cylinders
- 4
- Forward gears
- 10
CockshuttCockshutt 1265
vs
CockshuttCockshutt 1350
How they compare
Headline specs vs. the whole Utility
Engine Displacement
▲ 1350 higher · +48 ci (+30%)1265158 ci
1350206 ci
Median Utility Tractor183 ci
1265 is in the 42nd percentile; 1350 is in the 57th · 5,580 models
Cylinders
▲ 1350 higher · +1 (+33%)12653
13504
Median Utility Tractor4
1265 is in the 23rd percentile; 1350 is in the 50th · 5,720 models
Forward Gears
▲ 1350 higher · +4 (+67%)12656
135010
Median Utility Tractor12
1265 is in the 11th percentile; 1350 is in the 39th · 4,941 models
Operating Weight
▲ 1350 higher · +550 lb (+15%)12653,710 lb
13504,260 lb
Median Utility Tractor5,303 lb
1265 is in the 32nd percentile; 1350 is in the 40th · 5,107 models
1265 (A)1350 (B)Median Utility Tractor
Full comparison
Every spec, side by side
General Information
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Cockshutt | Cockshutt | Same |
| Model | 1265 | 1350 | — |
| Category | Utility | Row Crop | — |
Engine
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Fiat | Minneapolis-Moline | — |
| Rated RPM | 2,400RPM | 1,750RPM | ▲ 1265+650 RPM · +37% |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 | ▲ 1350+1 · +33% |
| Displacement | 158ci | 206ci | ▲ 1350+48 ci · +30% |
| Bore | 3.9in | 3.6in | ▲ 1265+0.3 in · +8% |
| Stroke | 4.3in | 5in | ▲ 1350+0.7 in · +16% |
Transmission
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Partially Synchronized | Ampli-Torc (Partial power shift) | — |
Dimensions & Weight
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 115in | 133in | ▲ 1350+18 in · +16% |
| Width | 62.5in | 70.3in | ▲ 1350+7.8 in · +12% |
| Height | 56.6in | 70.6in | ▲ 1350+14 in · +25% |
| Operating Weight | 3,710lb | 4,260lb | ▲ 1350+550 lb · +15% |
Hydraulics
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| System Type | Open Center | Not recorded | — |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | manual | — |
Tread Width
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Front Tread Width | 6in | Not recorded | — |
| Rear Tread | 13.6in | Not recorded | — |
Hitch & Towing
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hitch Type | Three-Point Hitch | Not recorded | — |
| Hitch Category | II/I | II | — |
| Hitch Position | Rear | Not recorded | — |
Chassis & Drive
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chassis Type | 4x2 2WD | 4x2 2WD | Same |
| Drive Type | 2WD | 2WD | Same |
| Steering Type | Not recorded | manual | — |
Electrical
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter Type | Electric | Electric Start | — |
Capacities
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coolant | 3.4gal | 3gal | ▲ 1265+0.4 gal · +13% |
Operator Station
| Spec | Cockshutt 1265 | Cockshutt 1350 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Open | Not recorded | — |
Category context
Both models against the field
Engine Displacement
median 183 ciA · 42nd percentile (158 ci)B · 57th percentile (206 ci)
Cylinders
median 4A · 23rd percentile (3)B · 50th percentile (4)
Forward Gears
median 12A · 11th percentile (6)B · 39th percentile (10)
Operating Weight
median 5,303 lbA · 32nd percentile (3,710 lb)B · 40th percentile (4,260 lb)
Length
median 137 inA · 20th percentile (115 in)B · 44th percentile (133 in)
A · 1265B · 1350Median Utility Tractor